It's not possible nothing but 1 times 5 is the only thing that multiplies to 5 and 1+5 doesn't equal 4
<em>So</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>right</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>option</em><em> </em><em>C</em>
<em>Look</em><em> </em><em>at</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>attached</em><em> </em><em>picture</em>
<em>Hope </em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
Answer: the statements and resons, from the given bench, that fill in the blank are shown in italic and bold in this table:
Statement Reason
1. K is the midpoint of segment JL Given
2. segment JK ≅ segment KL <em>Definition of midpoint</em>
3. <em>L is the midpoint of segment KM</em> Given
4. <em>segment KL ≅ segment LM</em> Definition of midpoint
5. segment JK ≅ segment LM Transitive Property of
Congruence
Explanation:
1. First blank: you must indicate the reason of the statement "segment JK ≅ segment KL". Since you it is given that K is the midpoint of segment JL, the statement follows from the very <em>Definition of midpoint</em>.
2. Second blank: you must add a given statement. The other given statement is <em>segment KL ≅ segment LM</em> .
3. Third blank: you must indicate the statement that corresponds to the definition of midpoint. That is <em>segment KL ≅ segment LM</em> .
4. Fourth and fith blanks: you must indicate the statement and reason necessary to conclude with the proof. Since, you have already proved that segment JK ≅ segment KL and segment KL ≅ segment LM it is by the transitive property of congruence that segment JK ≅ segment LM.
