Answer: Interpleader
Explanation:
The broker just engaged in an Interpleader action which is an action that allows a person who does not own a certain property to get the claimants to the property to go to court for it. The Court will then decide who should get the property after proceedings.
The Broker does not own the deposit but seeing as he did not want to get into trouble with either the Seller or the Buyer, he put the deposit with the courts so that they would decide who owns the deposit.
Answer: Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Cost of new economics textbook = $100
Cost of new CD player = $100
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
As the cost of both the products are identical, so the opportunity cost of buying new economics textbook is the enjoyment of the new CD player.
Answer:
'Government Expenditure' not 'Government' is a component of GD[
Explanation:
GDP is the total value of goods & services produced in an economy during an year.
As per Expenditure method :
- It is calculated as 'expenditure' done by all sectors of economy as "<em>one person expenditure is other person income</em>".
- 4 sectors are : households , firms, government ,rest of the world.
- Their respective demand expenditures are : Private Final Consumption Expenditure , Government Final Consumption Expenditure, Investment (Gross domestic Capital Formation) , Net Exports.
•Make sure she is financially able to cope if losses are made. Investing in stock markets are risky and the money she put in could be lost so she must make sure she has other savings so she doesn't go in debt/bankrupt.
•Research in order to make an informed choice. She could research types of assets, expert advice, and how the investment would be split.
Answer:
The correct answer is: he lacked the mental capacity to enter into the contract.
Explanation:
A person may ratify a contract that he or she established while intoxicated after becoming sober, and therefore become fully responsible for it. Though, if that person wants to reject the contract, proof of mental lack of capacity must be provided to dissolve the contract and any responsibility inherent.
