Answer:
d. functional
Explanation:
A functional manager can be described as a managers whose responsibility is to manage an organizational unit such as a department within an organization.
A manager can be given the responsibility to manager a specific department such as marketing, engineering, IT, or public relations.
The primary role of a functional manager is to be in charge and manage resources in his department, and to also to direct the technical work of people working on a project under his functional area.
Therefore, managers who are responsible for just one organizational activity are known as <u>functional managers</u>. The correct option is d. functional.
Answer:
Explanation:
According to the law of demand,a rise in price leads to a decrease in quantity demanded and a fall in price leads to an increase in quantity demanded.
1.The price of a gallon of 2% milk has risen, therefore, quantity demanded decreases.
2.The price of laser tag has fallen,therefore,quantity demanded increases.
3.The price of dressers and desks has risen,therefore,quantity demanded decreases.
4.The price of pork shoulder has fallen from $3.99 per pound to $1.99 per pound,therefore,quantity demanded increases.
5.Another MP3 album comes free,with purchase of an MP3 album .This means the supplier have effectively halved the price.therefore,quantity demanded increases.
Answer:
the self employment tax on 92.35% of your net income as self employed by 15.3% = $193,800 x 92.35% = $178,974.30
Miranda will pay social security (OASDI) taxes for the first $137,700 = $137,700 x 6.2% x 2 = $17,074.80
Her Medicare taxes will be calculated using $178,974.30 x 1.45% x 2 = $5,190.25
total self employment taxes = $17,074.80 + $5,190.25 = $22,265.05
Miranda can deduct 50% of her self employment taxes from her AGI = $22,265 x 50% = $11,132.50 ≈ $11,133
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Context
Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.
In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.
1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.
Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.
Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.
Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.
The standard view in economics is that tax cuts without SPENDING CUTS will INCREASE the budget deficit resulting in CROWDING OUT INVESTMENT. When a government lowers tax without minimizing its spending, it leads to crowding out investment effect, which is a situation in which increased interest rates leads to a decrease in private investment spending in such a way that it takes color out of the initial increase of total investment spending.
