<em><u>Answer</u></em>: Because Jesus is God's son that wipe every sin from the earth. He didn't brag, he doesn't sin so, having a proud heart is sinning. Jesus carried out burden on his shoulders.
I think this answer your question.
However, both ideas should be "tested" using "an empirical approach" to see if they hold up under scrutiny.
Empirical approach alludes to the logical strategy for inquiry and perception through experiments.
Psychology is additionally a science which is related to the thought behind empirical approach is to take your own convictions and inclinations out of the condition from real examinations. You should make determinations in view of empirical information and not what your feeling says.
Since, psychology manages sentiments and feelings, it is difficult to precisely quantify information. So it is more vital for clinicians to take after empirical approach before distributing any hypothesis or speculation.
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled Bible reading or any type of prayer unconstitutional.
Explanation:
This is due to separation of Church and State. Considering public schools are state funded, the allowance of religion was found unconstitutional.
Answer:
The inference that is best supported by the passage is: A. Prior to the "Click it or Ticket" law, motorist could not be stopped simply for not waring a seatbelt."
Explanation:
In the passage is very clear that in the new law motorist can be now pulled over and ticketed for not wearing seatbelts (later in the passage it implies that's the reason why lawyers and citizens' gorups are protesting), which implies that before the state legislature passed the law this was not a reason to be pulled over even though this is not stated in the passage, the entire text circles around the novelty of pulling over motorist for not wearing seatbelt, therefore the best option is A especially because that is the main idea of the text.
