The 3rd one is correct I’m pretty sure
Answer: c. Tenancy in common
Explanation: When two or more parties concurrently or simultaneously posses distinct and undivided ownership of a property such that each distinct party has the right to bargain or transact his or her own interest in the property without needing to inform or seek consent of the other parties. Tenancy in common does not subject the owners to having equal share of the property, any of the parties may wish to transfer or attach a creditor to his or her interest. Also, in tenancy in common, upon the death of any party or interest holder, the heir of the tenant becomes the owner of the tenant's interest.
Answer: it’s C. Our individualism
Explanation:
I got that
Answer:
<u><em>A universal law</em></u>.
Kant says that when trying to decide whether an action is morally permissible, we must ask if we can consistently will that the maxim of our action should become <u><em>a universal law.</em></u>
Explanation:
The moral concept in Kant drives from the idea of the universal law. According to him, humans must consider if their actions are good or bad if implies and are toward the world. If it is good for the world, it is morally acceptable. On the contrary, just forget. It's pretty simple on the surface, but when we analyze deeply we can see that moral is a complicated concept that is not easy to measure.
Mass production facilitates the efficient production of a large number of similar products
