Reconstruction is a good organizing topic for the post–Civil War era.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the Union tasted the fruit of victory in 1865's Civil War, it provided the saves with the freedom. Also, there was huge damage in the South that made the South economically poor. Soon after passing the Abolishment act President Lincoln was assassinated.
Then the presidency was automatically given to Andrew Johnson. Andrew always had thoughts the same as Lincoln had. They wanted to rebuild the South back so Johnson announced the plan of "Reconstruction". That reflected in both Unionism and in the state's rights. With the help of the Union army, the lands were built back.
Thus the rebuilt lands were provided to the freed slaves by the Freedmen Bureau and Union Army. The Reconstruction plan existed till 1877 and it stopped due to the rise of southern whites' violence. Because of the changes made by Congress in the Reconstruction plan that turned it into a Radical Reconstruction plan.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
The founders viewed the constitution as an agreement between the people and the government that could be broken if the government failed to do its job.
This Enlightenment idea is based on popular sovereignty.
During the Enlightenment, new and innovative ideas about government, society, and people's rights were developed by prominent and bright minds. We are talking about thinkers and philosophers of the Enlightenment such as Baron de Montesquieu, Voltaire, Jhon Lock, and Jean-Jaques Rosseau.
These authors and their ideas influenced later revolutionary movements in Europe and the Americas, as was the case of the Revolutionary War of the 13 colonies, and the French Revolution.
That is definitely Okies, I did this literally yesterday. Plus it's in my book. Hope this helped! :)
Legal right that a court has to receive a case first. For example, the Constitution makes it clear that the Supreme court has 'original jurisdiction' when states sue states and in cases involving high-level diplomats.
