Answer:
The summary according to the given scenario is summarized below.
Explanation:
- This same case eventually commits mistakes as well as the seriously lacking moment in time mistakes. That was because supporting in favor of the aforementioned individual will ensure that advancement is not reasonable.
- There seems to be no factual evidence throughout the assumption that the adversary will drag society towards history if any individual is appointed.
People often make different comments. Reagan says that Carter has misrepresented the evidence because he has not provided context on government spending in California.
<h3>What is misrepresentation of evidence?</h3>
The act of Proving misrepresentation shows or depicts the burden of proof that has been laid on the plaintiff to provide some key evidence that the defendant misrepresented the said information which has some major of damage on the plaintiff or has caused him some major of loss.
Reagan believes that Carter has misrepresented the evidence due to the fact that he has not given any form of context on government spending done in California.
Learn more about misrepresentation from
brainly.com/question/5792449
The aboriginal family structure has been the cohesive force binding Aboriginal people and culture in Australia- this explanation BEST describes this force and how it has helped preserve Aboriginal heritage.
Option: B
Explanation:
Aboriginal society has greatly affected by the colonization. They disturbed the livelihood pattern, lands, laws and spiritual beliefs of the aboriginals. Their life became traumatized. Though there has been a stable force which secures the lives of aboriginals in Australia and make them safe from the attack of colonization.
The aboroginal family structure has been one inherent cohesive force that binded all the aboroginal people into a group of strength and culture in Australia. This unity and power of togetherness was their best supports in their tough time against the war with British colonizer.