I'm a little bit confused between a and b..
but I found this maybe it will help u..
Explanation:
The Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self- defense within the home.
Answer:
Under the economic theory of deterrence, an increase in the cost of crime should deter people from committing the crime, and there is evidence that individuals who believe they are likely to be arrested and punished are less likely to commit a crime than those who do not expect to be captured or punished.
Explanation:
Answer:
Example I: A Californian who owns a computer store, who wants to relocate to Virginia has the same rights of commerce that apply to a Virginian.
Example 2: A citizen of California is protected under the data privacy act, which restricts sharing personal data. If he moves to Washington state, which enacted the same law, he will have the same protection that a Washington citizen enjoys.
Explanation:
The privileges and immunities clause protects the individual right of a citizen of any state to enjoy the same privileges that a free citizen of another state possesses. This law was specifically designed to protect any person from losing his freedom to pursue and ultimately obtain happiness and federal protection. The examples above show that a citizen who wishes to relocate to another state in one state is entitled to the same privileges of a citizen of that state, including protection or restrictions under state laws.
Honestly I would say no, because the wife could have a problem delivering the baby
