Answer:
288ng/ml
Explanation:
A serial dilution is any dilution where the concentration decreases by the same quantity in each successive step.
- Serial dilutions are multiplicative.
it to 3 rounds of dilutions for the first tube so 3x6=12 so the 300-12=288
Answer:
b
Explanation:
but I have a grh have a great day of school and again and again and again and again and
nhi hai na ki Jay Shree shyameat day of school and again
The simplest case in which medical confidentiality can be breached is when there is patient consent. However, this does not allow professionals to publish information or medical records in absentia on social media — as this is also prohibited by the Code of Medical Ethics in its section on the subject.
<h3>What specific organizational recommendations would you make to the CIO to ensure he considers specialist records in your network support for all departments, including the HIM department?</h3>
The recommendations are to keep these patients confidential, so that their information is only available to doctors, and not open to the public.
<h3>Discuss psychotherapy notes as defined by HIPAA and how they are treated differently.</h3>
In general, patients or their legal representatives should be able to view and obtain copies of their medical records and request corrections if errors or mistakes are identified. For purposes of the US Privacy Act, a patient's "authorized personal representative" is a legal guardian able to make health care decisions, a representative in possession of a power of attorney for dealing with health-related matters, or a family member or friend authorized to act as a representative for decisions under US state law. Patients also have the right to allow third parties access to all or part of their medical records upon signed written authorization.
With this information, we can conclude that Ethical medical treatment always includes the need to keep patients' medical information confidential. However, the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act codified this responsibility for health workers.
Learn more aboute HIPAA in brainly.com/question/11277705
#SPJ1
Answer:
One of the conditions that she describe
was induced heart failure, which is basically a “broken heart.” She says that human doctors apparently discovered that this is true in humans around 2000. However, veterinarians had recognized this in the earlier 1970s. This just goes to show that there are more correlations between the two than people realize and could help substantially.
Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz's argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or
weak?
I think that her argument is extremely convincing and I definitely agree with her. Her statements about how she performed
the same functions on both humans and other animals helped portray the argument she was making but was also a strong point. I also thought that her naming the three
conditions was very strong
Explanation:
