Answer:
a) point estimate is 30%
b) null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
c) We reject the null hypothesis, percentage working people aged 65-69 had increased
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>a. </em>
Point estimate would be the proportion of the working people aged 65–69 to the sample size and equals
ie 30%
<em>b.</em>
Let p be the proportion of people aged 65–69 who is working. OECD claims that percentage working had increased. Then null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
<em>c.</em>
z-score of the sample proportion assuming null hypothesis is:
where
- p(s) is the sample proportion of working people aged 65–69 (0.3)
- p is the proportion assumed under null hypothesis. (0.27)
- N is the sample size (600)
then z=
= 1.655
Since one tailed p value of 1.655 = 0.048 < 0.05, sample proportion is significantly different than the proportion assumed in null hypothesis. Therefore we reject the null hypothesis.
24000 grams is 24 kilograms
Answer:
7 points
Step-by-step explanation:
started out w/ 5 points, then loses 8
5 - 8 = -3
gains 10 points
-3 + 10 = 7
Answer: 63 degrees (second choice)
The two angles shown are corresponding angles. They are both on the bottom side of their adjacent parallel line, and at the same time, they are also on the left side of the transversal line. This is why they are corresponding angles.
Corresponding angles are congruent if you have a set of parallel lines like the diagram shows. So that's why a = 63.
Answer:
y=-6x/square root (4x^2-160
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps please mark me brainliest