In a perfect world, Congress should reflect the many diverse backgrounds in the general population. That being said, it is unfortunately not the case in the real world. For example, women in the general populous are severely under represented in congress despite making up half of the population. People of color are also very underrepresented in congress. Finally, another group that is underrepresented is young adults. The average age of a congressperson is about 60 years old. This is disheartening for many young americans as they may feel as though those who represent them do not adequately understand them.
While there is an obvious disparity between the composition of congress and the general population, it should be noted that it is important to vote for candidates that have policies that you agree with. It would be silly to only vote for a candidate because of their race,religion, gender, etc. . While the composition of congress may not fully represent the general populous, it is important to understand that it is not necessarily a huge priority for them to represent the population perfectly. (In my personal opinion). Hope that helped!
Answer:
A vision statement is a document that states the current and future objectives of an organization. The vision statement is intended as a guide to help the organization make decisions that align with its philosophy and declared set of goals.
Explanation:
i did this already so i know the answer
They are selected by the existing judges
Stanford v. Kentucky, was a United States Supreme Court case in the year 1989 that sanctioned the imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were at least 16 years of age at the time of the crime.
The Supreme Court in the year 2005,while handling the Roper v. Simmons' case ruled that the death penalty is a disproportionate punishment for juveniles, and thus it violates the Eighth Amendment to impose a death sentence on a youthful murderer who committed the crime before age 18.
Christopher Simmons, who was 17 at the time, committed a crime that led to a death sentence.
The Court said that the society views juveniles as categorically less culpable than the average criminal. The supreme court argued than a man only becomes culpable of any criminal act when he reaches the age of 18, and claimed at imposing a death penalty on a young child who is not old enough to take charge of his own actions is wrong.
The supreme court claimed that a juvenile who committed a heinous crime can be made to forfeit his fundamental rights rather than being murdered.
