1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gladu [14]
3 years ago
14

You are driving a longer residential city street when you are stopped by a city police officer for speeding you are given a cita

tion and a summons to appear before a particular port .what court would they most likely be and why?
Law
1 answer:
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]3 years ago
8 0

the supreme court because speeding is illegal and bad

You might be interested in
The underlying principle behind the principle of stair decisis is _
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

Binding precedent relies on the legal principle of stare decisis.

Explanation:

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case.

Stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It ensures certainty and consistency in the application of law.

4 0
3 years ago
A political party’s presidential candidate is elected by ______?
Rzqust [24]

Answer: Electoral Votes

I Love all of you and hope you pass

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would be the hardest thing to deal with when you are a forensic scientist, collecting evidence or securing a crime scene? A
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

the hardest thing to deal with is people  that are with you will sometimes get your head messed up so make sure your partner is someone who can help you

8 0
3 years ago
Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

8 0
2 years ago
What does the law of demand state?
Burka [1]

Answer:

C)

Explanation:

This is because as the price of a good drops, the demand by the consumers for the good goes up

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In which federal court district is Indianapolis in
    13·1 answer
  • In the state of florida a first conviction for dui can result in your vehicle being fitted with an ignition for up to
    10·1 answer
  • Only president to serve two nonconsecutive terms True or False
    12·1 answer
  • What dose the Fourth Amendment require the police to do?
    7·2 answers
  • Cindy’s air conditioning compressor makes such a racket when operating that Tom, whose bedroom window is but 15 feet away from t
    5·2 answers
  • Read the three situations below and write the "check" or power that the branch of government would have on the situation. Use yo
    5·1 answer
  • 3
    15·2 answers
  • What can the criminal justice system do to better prepare for future terrorist incidents?
    11·1 answer
  • How might reading about a case or hearing about it on TV influence jurors?
    9·1 answer
  • 5. Police became aware of the crawl space because of a
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!