Answer:
Undisclosed dual agency
Explanation:
Undisclosed dual agency
Undisclosed dual agency is a dual agency relationship that is not disclosed and agreed to in writing. When sucn an incident occurs, the agent has breached his or her fiduciary responsibilities to the client, which happens to be illegal in some places it should be agreed then it is make legal by such an act.
Answer: The answer is a
Explanation:
Using the formula
Expected Rate of Return = ∑(i =1 to n) Ri Pi
Where Ri = Return in scenario 1
Pi = Probability for the return in scenario 1
i = Number of scenario
n = Total number of probability and Return
P1=30
R1 = 18
P2 = 50
R2 =12
P3 = 20
R3 =-5
Expected Gain =(30 ×18) + (50 × 12) + ( 20 × -5)
= 540 + 600 + - 100
= 1,040
= 1,040 ÷ 100
= 10.4%
Answer:
The tool is designed for taxpayers who were U.S. citizens or resident aliens for the entire tax year for which they're inquiring. If married, the spouse must also have been a U.S. citizen or resident alien for the entire tax year.
Explanation:
Yes you can change prices in such a way that the entire demand response is due to the income effect.
What is Income effect?
Usually, when we talk about perfect alternatives, we are talking about lowering the cost of the expensive good. If you were on the y axis of the performance subs graph, the price of good x, which was previously quite expensive, has now decreased. Therefore, your decision will be limited to the x axis.
The term "income effect" describes the shift in real income or purchasing power brought on by a price adjustment. Therefore, as prices drop, your real income essentially rises.
If we lower the cost of the already affordable good. The consumer's real income then rises. As a result, he purchases the cheap item.
Therefore, this shift in demand, where he now purchases more of the cheap commodity, has been brought about by an increase in real income due to a decrease in the price of the previously cheap good.
So, The answer is Yes.
To know more abou Income Effect:
brainly.com/question/1416285
#SPJ4
Answer:
104
Explanation:
Because there was 130 that were forfeited and each bottle is 0.80 I multiplied 0.80x130 and got 104
