Answer:
B
Explanation:
I think you've already figured this out for yourself, but I thought I'd answer anyway and maybe clarify some things.
Supply is the total amount of a <u>good or service</u> that is available to consumers.
- Think about it: goods are physical things bought and sold, like apples. Services are actions done for another person, like taxi driving or renting a used car.
- None of the other answers make sense: a "device" is not a strictly defined term in economics; an "industry" can't be available to consumers, and a "warranty" isn't applicable.
Medium of exchange because it's the purchase that is in question here
Answer:
This question is incomplete. However, I found the prompt to be as follows;
"What is the productivity measure of “units of output per dollar of input” averaged over the four-year period? "
Explanation:
To solve this question, find productivity;
Productivity in this case is total hamburgers produced divided by the total labor cost plus total equipment cost.
Productivity = # of hamburgers *52 weeks * 4 years / (total labor cost + equipment cost)
Productivity= 40,000(52)(4)/ {9,500(4) + 5000}
= 193.5 hamburgers/dollar of input
Therefore, the factory would produce about 194 burgers per dollar of input.
Answer:
c. skimming pricing
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Xerox was using a skimming pricing strategy to help recover the cost of its research and development. This is a pricing strategy in which the company places a really high initial price for it's new product, but then goes lowering the price as time passes. This also makes individuals believe that they are getting a bargain when prices begin to drop and decide to buy more.
Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
