Answer:
It is arguable that Europe and the world would have been better off had Germany been the victor in WWI. ...
Explanation:
A victorious Germany, after the war in the West ended, would have crushed the Bolsheviks in Russia, thus avoiding the pain and suffering Soviet rule imposed on the Russian people and, later, Eastern Europe.
<span>On January 8, 1815, the British marched against New Orleans, hoping that by capturing the city they could separate Louisiana from the rest of the United States. Pirate Jean Lafitte, however, had warned the Americans of the attack, and the arriving British found militiamen under General Andrew Jackson strongly entrenched at the Rodriquez Canal. In two separate assaults, the 7,500 British soldiers under Sir Edward Pakenham were unable to penetrate the U.S. defenses, and Jackson’s 4,500 troops, many of them expert marksmen from Kentucky and Tennessee, decimated the British lines. In half an hour, the British had retreated, General Pakenham was dead, and nearly 2,000 of his men were killed, wounded, or missing. U.S. forces suffered only EIGHT KILLED and 13 wounded.</span>
<span>A large portion of Siberia is covered in permafrost, which basically means that the ground is frozen all year around. As a result it would be difficult to dig for resources in Siberia. Additionally Siberia is quite cold making the working conditions there very harsh.</span>
Answer:
England and Spain in which i beleive
Explanation: