All categories

3 years ago

Was it an advantage or disadvantage to allow men,women, and children to colonize Plymouth?

History

1 answer:

Trava [24]3 years ago

5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

It was an advantage for men, women, and children.

The people who founded the colony of Plymouth, in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, were known as Pilgrims. They belonged to the English Separatist Church that had many differences with the Church of England. This created a problem for them. They were being persecuted and they decided to leave England to find a new place to safely grow their children and can practice their strict religious teachings.

That is why they traveled on the Mayflower ship to the North American coasts. When they arrived at North America in 1620, they had to endure harsh weather conditions and make friends with the Native America Indians to establish the firsts English colony in Massachusets. In the end, it represented an advantage for Pilgrims and they started a new life there.

You might be interested in

The _________invaded England in 1066, led by William the Conquerer.

ryzh [129]

The "Normans" invaded England in 1066, led by William the Conquerer, since this invasion brought in a new era in England that caused many of todays customs to form.

8 0

3 years ago

As a result of Joseph McCarthy’s accusations and his committee hearings, McCarthy was accused of falsifying documents and impeac

Westkost [7]

B) thousands were accused of being communist sympathizers.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Discuss the benefits and problems of capitalism and s

Zigmanuir [339]

Capitalism is an economic system in which investments in an ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations specially as contrasted to cooperatively state-owned means of wealth. Socialism is a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

<h2>Why do people say that capitalism works better than socialism?</h2>

Capitalism and socialism have both been put to the test. Socialism never works; capitalism occasionally does. The outcomes are self-evident.

China. After the cultural revolution, the communist party seized power in China. They didn't have much financial success with anything. In its place, starvation claimed the lives of millions. Capitalist policies were put into place when Moa Zedong left office, and economic development suddenly skyrocketed.
US versus USSR The huge ideological conflict between capitalism and socialism was eventually the cause of the cold war. The sides began on land that was largely level. There is no doubt who won. The USA is currently the world's most powerful country by a wide margin. There is no longer a Soviet Union.
Almost all affluent countries, including the UK, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, and even the Nordic countries, have capitalist systems. All have different amounts of social expenditure, but this is only sustained by the underlying capitalism.
Cuba. Cubans are all equal, yet they are all equally impoverished. Nearly everyone in Cuba has it better than even those who are regarded as impoverished in prosperous countries like the USA.
Venezuela. elected a communist administration. They are currently in financial ruin. It would be difficult to locate a socialist administration that has made any effort to better the lives of its citizens. Although I would think there are none at all, perhaps I haven't looked closely enough.

In conclusion, a basic misunderstanding of human nature is the basis of socialism. When everyone actually ends up doing is trying to piggyback off of everyone else's hard work, it makes the false assumption that everyone is willing to labor selflessly for the benefit of the group. Although it is not a flawless system, capitalism at least provides a reward for effort. And when it comes down to it, hard effort is what improves our lives.

<h2>What are the pros and cons of socialism and capitalism?</h2>

Capitalism:

Pros ⇒ It is a method of voluntary trade. It is the best at allocating scarce resources. It has given people the highest quality of life in human history. Property rights, arbitrary assessments, and free will are all protected. It best manages self-interest. It rewards people who make the world a better place by making them rich. Static economic classes are eliminated by capitalism's dynamic character. Of course, there is more.

Cons ⇒ There isn't a spokesperson for free market capitalism. Market manipulation, monopolies, oligopolies, cronyism, fascism, inflation, central banking, fractional reserve banking, and any other financial news-related scheme are all confused with it.

Socialism:

Pro ⇒ Fair distribution of total generated wealth

Cons ⇒ It is oppressive. The loss of private property in the means of production prevents accurate economic calculations. Rare resources are squandered since there aren't genuine prices (actual prices reflect consumer values) (mountains of Soviet concrete). It does not satisfy the insatiable human drive for more (demand). denies possessing oneself. It establishes two static classes, one for workers and the other for politicians. Marx demanded that "undesirables" be removed from society (Irish, Scottish and non-whites).

8 0

2 years ago

Are these answers correct?

adell [148]

The correct answers are:

1. Map Key: because a Map Key is an item that gives you important information about the meaning of the symbols or colors presented in a map.

2. Climate: because the Climate is the analysis of weather over a long period of time, where the meteorologists analize and assesses the weather in a place to know the usual weather patterns there.

3. Cultural Difussion: because Cultural Difussion is the propagation of cultural ideas, activities, beliefs, mores and goods from one culture to another, where borders are widened and occur the cultural exchange.

4. Absolute Location: because an Absolute Location is an explanation of a specific location or coordinates (Lattitude and Longitude) to find an exact spot in Earth.

5. Nonrenewable Resources: because materials such as fossil fuels, metals, and minerals are resources that can't be renewed by theirselves at a enough rate as the human consumption does, so they are limited and could disappear in a near future.

6. Prime Meridian: because The Prime Meridian is a vertical unreal line located at 0º degrees longitude, and that line separate earth in eastern and western.

7. Globe: because a Globe is the better Earth model or representation, that allows people to know the landmasses, water bodies and territories of the Earth.

8. Rain Forest: because the Rain Forest is too dense that is the perfect environment for millions of plants and animals species.

9. Democracy: because the core of Democracy is that the country future will always be determined by the people decision thorough voting.

10. Empire: because an Empire is when there are a number of territories that were conquered by a ruler and are submitted to a unique authority.

11. Tribunes: because Tribunes were chosen by plebeians that were allowed to convoke the Senate, present legislation and intercede in help of the plebeians in legal areas, but the maximum power was to veto the consuls, magistrates and government actions to protect the plebeians.

12. Neolithic: because Neolithic was an era where people started to cultivate wild cereals and appeared the first evidences of farming to produce their own food.

13. Civilization: because Civilization is a highly organized society that is considered advanced due to the great development in the science, economy, arts, culture and government.

14. Tyrant: because a Tyrant is when someone seized power and rule a country or a polis by oppressive and unjust form.

15. Polis: because Polis was the designation granted to the independent city-states in ancient Greece.

So, for that reasons, all the answers written on that exercise are correct.

6 0

3 years ago

Let me say this again

serg [7]

Answer:

Yes, Alberto Fujimori, the former president of Peru.

Explanation:

He ruled from July 28, 1990 until he was impeached in November 22, 2000 after he was accused of embezzlement of government funds, war crimes against the insurgents, and general corruption. After he accusations began to become widespread, he fled Peru and took refuge in Japan. Japan and Peru did not have any extradition treaty. On top of this, he is a Japanese citizen, and it would go against Japanese law to extradict citizens.

Fujimori then resigned over fax, but the Peruvian government didn't accept it, and impeached him. He was extradited back to Peru from Chile in 2007, and convicted. He was pardoned in 2017, but then it got overturned in 2018 and he was ordered to return to prison.

8 0

3 years ago