The court asserted, because such operations occur entirely in one state. in short, congress has the power to regulate trade but not manufacturing. so it would be, A the supreme court ruled that the american sugar company was a legal monopoly since it existed only in one state.
Answer:
ahh because they needed for food?
Explanation:
Answer:
D. NONE of these answers are correct
Explanation:
Stephen F. Austin was jailed in Mexico because of actions that were deemed traitorous because of a letter he wrote to the government on behalf of the colonists at Texas.
Austin wrote to the Texans and asked them to shelve plans for revolution
He made this speech to the Texans when he came back from prison,
“The revolution in Mexico is drawing to a close. The object is to change the form of government, destroy the federal constitution of 1824, and establish a central or consolidated government. The states are to be converted into provinces. Whether the people of Texas ought or ought not to agree to this change, and relinquish all or part of their constitutional and vested rights under the constitution of 1824, is a question of the most vital importance; one that calls for the deliberate consideration of the people”[5]
Answer: The answer is ether a or c.
Explanation: I say this bc the Reagan Doctrine is anawnsed histery, and there was a Ripple Effect from Reagan's 'Economic War' on the USSR. So in conclusion im not that sure but at least i can tell you that it is one of thous two answers :)
Answer:
The answer is A. William Penn.
Explanation:
Penn was given a land grant in the New World by king Charles II in 1681 to pay off a debt to Penn´s family. He had been jailed for his Quaker beliefs. He traveled to North America and founded Pennsylvania, which was supposed to be a shelter of religious freedom and tolerant practices.
