The correct answer is a. 47.10 - 25 + d = 97.43.
This is because you have to subtract the $25, because it is a withdrawal, or taking out of money.
This rules out options C and D.
Also, Tina made a deposit of an amount that she can't remember. A deposit is adding a certain amount of money, so you have to +d.
This rules out option B.
The only option left is option A, which makes complete sense.
Answer: Option C
Step-by-step explanation:
In group(1), the risk is= 5/2000 x 100
= 0.25
In group(2), the risk is= 5/1000 x 100
= 0.5
The sample relative risk is= 0.25/0.5
= 0.5
So, option C is correct.
Answer:2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
6.4
Step-by-step explanation:
Box like a fish Box like a fish Nemo in my box, I found Nemo, Litteraly free, freer than a costco sample, public restroom, and dollor off cupon at Dollor store, Dog water
Yes it is true that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars because null hypothesis is rejected.
Given among 2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticut trucks, 45 had only rear license plates.
let
be the probability that commercial cars have rear license plates and
be the probability that connected trucks have rear license plates.
Cars Trucks Total
Total 2049 334 2383
x 239 45 284
p 0.1166 0.1347 0.1191
α=0.05
Hypothesis will be :


It is a left tailed test at 0.05 significance.
Standard errors of p=
=
=
=0.0066
Test statistic Z=p difference/standard error
=(0.1166-0.1347)/0.0066
=-0.0181/0.0061
=-2.967
p value=0.001505<5%
Since p is less than 5% we reject null hypothesis.
We cannot calculate standard deviation so we cannot calculate confidence interval.
Hence there is statistical evidence at 5% significance level to support that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars.
Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510
#SPJ4