Answer:
Caucasian Americans have historically been discriminated against in American history. For example, just this week the President of the United States of America stated that he would only hire an African American Woman to become the next member of the Supreme Court. That is obviously discriminatory against Caucasion Americans and Americans of European ethnicity. But it is not just the actions of the President of the United States, but also the actions of the academic and professional worlds. In Acadmia, colleges will actively seek out students of diverse backgrounds, discriminating against Caucasian, European Americans. This is a totally discriminatory practice, but all together very common in the US. In addition to this racist practice, businesses in the private sector are no longer allowed to ask about your race or ethnicity which means they can no longer give preferential treatment to European Americans. This is hugely discriminatory when it comes to maintaining the exclusitivity of the all american work force. Without this type of questions, hiring managers may never interview caucasian americans like Billy, Bobby, or Chad. These discriminatory practices have no business in the USA. We need to make systemic changes so that we never again see these discriminatory practices.
Explanation:
Critique Olivera's approach on leading the turnaround process because of overconfidence and unrealistic expectation.
<h3>
Critique Olivera's approach on leading the turnaround process?</h3>
Olivera's strategy for managing the turnaround process wasn't very successful. Considering his prior success as an MT, he was overconfident. He had brilliant ideas and was skilled at analyzing the issues that the organization was experiencing inside.
However, he attempted to force such concepts on the four supervisors without first seeking his approval. When he proposed new plans or a change to the way they were functioning, the supervisors resisted because they had considerably more work experience than he did. It is normal to feel in charge when someone new appears out of nowhere and criticizes how things are being done. As a result, the supervisors disapproved of this change strategy.
<h3>
what would you have done differently?</h3>
An organization's goal is frequently to improve when it decides to launch a transformation program. I would have taken a variety of other actions if I were him. I would get to know the staff members better and develop a close personal bond with them during the first few months. Planning a lunch, a supper, or an expedition will help the team bond better. After that, I would visit with each department to discuss any problems they may be having or problems they think are hurting the company's sales.
After that, I would assess whether my observations matched up with the actual issues that employees believed the company was experiencing. Instead of making all the decisions at once, I would solicit the supervisors' opinions on the issues or areas they believe may be improved before providing my own perspective. In order to bring about change, I would advise the supervisor to explore each potential option one at a time without rushing.
Learn more about transformation program: brainly.com/question/10411144
#SPJ4
It was banned in the mid to late 1800s.
The answer is The Placebo Effect.
The placebo effect is an substance with no known medical effects, such as sterile water, saline solution or a sugar pill
