Answer:
192.1
Explanation:
From monday and friday you earned 130$ because 6(10)+7(10)=130
Saturday you earned 96$ (12x8)
so adding those values you have 226$
you have to subtract 15% for tax.
So the equation would be

Answer: Providing proof that she completed all of the continuing education requirements for the year she last held a license.
Explanation:
Based on the information given, since the license of Agatha has expired, one of the requirements that she must meet in order to be re-licensed is to provide proof that she completed all of the continuing education requirements for the year she last held a license.
It should be noted that providing proof that she still meets the qualifications to be a mortgage loan originator or information that relates to her previous license isn't required.
Answer:
$22,000
Explanation:
Given that
1st house rented = 10,000
2nd house estimated rent = 12,000
Therefore,
The two houses would contribute
= 10,000 + 12000
= $22,000
Note: Rent is considered as consumption and as a result, rent is added into the GDP. Also, in GDP estimation, imputed rent which is the amount a house owner is willing to rent a house away for if he decides to is calculated as part of the GDP.
Answer:
1. Annual demand ( D) = 100,000 bags
Ordering cost per order (Co) = $15
Holding cost per item per annum (H) = 15% x $2 = $0.30
EOQ = √<u>2DCo</u>
H
EOQ = √<u>2 x 100,000 x $15</u>
0.30
EOQ = 3,162 units
2. Maximum inventory
= Safety stock + EOQ
= 1,500 + 3,162
= 4,662 units
3. Average inventory
= EOQ/2
= <u>3,162</u>
2
= 1,581 units
4. Number of order
= <u>Annual demand</u>
EOQ
= <u>100,000</u>
3,162
= 32 times
Explanation:
EOQ is the square root of 2 multiplied by annual demand and ordering cost per order divided by holding cost per item per annum.
Maximum inventory is the aggregate of safety stock and EOQ.
Average inventory is economic order quantity divided by 2
Number of order is the ratio of annual demand to economic order quantity.
Answer:
Explanation:
In my opinion, I would like to say that Clean Machines Company is correct. If you look at it this way, you'd see that there actually isn't any contract between Clean Machines Company and Dealer. When it came to about offers, the person offering is able to revoke an offer before the offer is even accepted. And he won't be held responsible unless of course, the offer is irrevocable. Then, to make the offer to be irrevocable, the Dealer then would have needed to prove that an option was present, or prove that the offer is was not able to be revoked due to UCC provision.