1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DiKsa [7]
2 years ago
11

Beth is a passenger in a car that Caleb is driving when an accident occurs. Both Caleb and Beth are emotionally rattled, but nei

ther is physically hurt. Caleb is not liable to Beth on a negligence theory because: a) both parties were emotionally rattled. b) Beth was not injured. c) Caleb apparently did not intend to cause an accident. d) Beth must have been comparatively negligent.
Social Studies
1 answer:
earnstyle [38]2 years ago
6 0

The correct answer would be option B.

Beth was not Injured.

Explanation:

Negligence theory is a theory that talks about the failure of exercising the amount of care a person can show that a person with ordinary wisdom would have exercised in the same circumstances, situations or conditions.

So in this given example, when Caleb was driving a car and Beth was sitting with him, they met an accident. They both were emotionally rattled but non of them got hurt.

So according to negligence theory, Caleb is not liable to Beth, because Beth was not injured or hurt physically. If he would have hurt or injured due to the negligence of Caleb, then Caleb was responsible and liable to Beth.

Learn more about Negligence theory at:

brainly.com/question/8098652

#LearnWithBrainly

You might be interested in
Describe the word play that occurs in this passage what is the author using the word expectations
Gnoma [55]

Answer:

idk find someone else

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Legislative Branch - What do the different members of Congress get paid? What other benefits do they receive as part of the job?
Viktor [21]
The basic salary is $174,000 per year, plus benefits, such as retirement and health benefits. They're eligible for a pension after they reach 50 years of age and 20 years of service, and can receive pension after a minimum of 5 years of service under other conditions.
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following are violation requirements of Section 1 of the Sherman Act? Group of answer choices Two or more parties h
Inga [223]

Answer:

Those parties agree to restrain competition

Explanation:

Sherman Antitrust Act of 1980 deals specifically about the regulation of competitions among enterprises. It was principally authored or engineered by Senator John Sherman, under President Benjamin Harrison, hence, the name Sherman Act.

Sherman Antitrust Act which is divided into three section, has its first section which is section 1 worded as:

"Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal."

The main purpose of this, is to forbid or make illegal any anticompetition practices.

3 0
3 years ago
A hypothetical clothing company called GreenDuds prides itself on not using international child labor to manufacture its product
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

It breaks the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Explanation:

The Fourth Amendment is about the right for privacy and freedom, and it protects the citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. It protects the individual inside their homes and, most recently, in the use of tecnologies. There is a need to have a search warrant granted by a judge to investigate insides people houses and phones.

The GreenDuds company is acting against the law when it allows the investigators to use "whatever means necessary", since it assumes that they will probably break phone records not by doing a claim to a judge, but by unlawful means, such as hacking or paying someone in the phones company to provide those informations.

3 0
3 years ago
Do you think that the assimilation policy adopted by the us government was a good idea
pashok25 [27]
No, because by taking children away from their families, it destroyed traditional cultures, and aboriginal society.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the outcome for the Russo Japanese war a concern for the Europeans
    14·1 answer
  • what effect did slavery have on the english colonies? what gave many enslaved africans reason to hope for freedom?
    15·1 answer
  • As the subject of an experiment for treating cigarette addiction, john is being given a chemical agent that makes him feel nause
    6·1 answer
  • Why are producers the first trophic level to benefit from the activity of decomposers
    12·1 answer
  • What punishment<br> was given to people<br> who stole gold that<br> was not theirs?
    9·1 answer
  • SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO <br> how are ya?
    10·1 answer
  • How much percentage of population belongs to indo-european​
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER FAST!!!
    13·1 answer
  • What percentage of american adults think chocolate milk comes from brown cows?.
    9·2 answers
  • which of these statements is true? multiple choice social norms can influence even small behaviors, like taking one's hat on and
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!