Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Bussiness company house idk
Answer:
Option A Risks affecting the business operations and potential outcomes of an organization's activities.
Explanation:
The reason is that the business risk are those risks that has potential to increase the cost of the company or decrease the revenue of the organization. So here the misstatement will not increase the cost of the organization and the only risk that increase the cost or decrease the revenues is the poor performance of the organization's activities and operations. So the right option which doesn't talks about misstatements is option A.
Answer:
Highly inelastic
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand is a measure of the demand of a given service or commodity by utilizing it's price change. It can be calculated using the formula;
Price elasticity of demand=%change in quantity demanded/%change in price
%change in quantity demanded=((Final demand-Initial demand)/Initial demand)×100
((299-300)/300)×100=-0.33%
%change in price=12%
12%>0.33%
The change in price is larger than the change in demand, therefor the product is highly inelastic
Answer: a. He has an acquisition cost of $4,800 and a date of acquisition of March 15, 2007.
Explanation:
A Put amount gives the holder the right to sell underlying assets. As the Put was exercised, the customer would have to buy the underlying stock and the price they will pay for it is the strike price of the Put less the cost of the Put.
Options contracts come in 100s so;
Acquisition cost = (50 - 2) * 100
= 48 * 100
= $4,800.
The date of acquisition is the day the put was exercised.
