Answer:
It can be said that the context in which the play was written (for example Shakespeare time) would be relevant to understand the context of the story. Background information about dates, customs role of the men and women, religion and politics might be crucial to understand the play better. These ideas might help the reader to set a context and be able to comprehend some character´s action and decision.
It is sometimes difficult to judged a play with a modern eye because society has changed a lot since then that is why reading about context would help.
Explanation:
Answer: Its either A or D
Explanation:
The reason I say A:
The author includes that Jeremy had gotten paint everywhere, even on the ceiling. Jeremy had also helped himself to her paint sets ( In my opinion this was a problem )
The reason I think its D:
The other gives a short bio on what they both like. ( I don't think it would be this but go with your gut feeling!)
disclaimer: this is just my opinion! choose whatever one you think is correct!.
The reason i do not think its C : Nowhere in the text is there a specific detail about the paint except that jeremy is being messy.
The reason i do not think its D: Chronological order has to do with stories that are told in order of time.
Disclaimer again: As i said before, you do not have to choose this , this is just what i think. Go with what you think is correct... If its wrong come back!.
This is incorrect because for an argument to be valid it's premises have to be truthful. Fallacies are logical errors which make the premises untruthful and should therefore be avoided. There are various types of fallacies but most commonly they are divided into inductive and deductive fallacies.
"The Canterbury Tales" is actually a book that was written by <span>Geoffrey Chaucer and based on the excerpt taken from this book, the statement that best states how the Pardoner is being described in this passage is that he is confident and a suave performer. The answer would be B.</span>
