Answer:
Option D Showing the absence of privity of contract between it and the consumer.
Explanation:
The reason is that privity of contract says that the party of the contract are only allowable to sue each other which in other words can enforce the other to fulfill his requirements that were agreed while forming contract. So the right answer is option D because it is not related to the negligence claim.
The duty of care that the company owes towards its product's users includes using appropriate production process so that the customer will not be injured, placing the caution and warning labels so that the person can save him from the injury and the company has used components that will not harm the user of the product.
So all the options are correct except option D.
Answer:
B-False
Explanation:
After the retrospective discussion all the improvement items discussed are placed in the Product Backlog. To ensure continuous improvement, the next sprint backlog ( & not the current one) should include at least one high priority process improvement which was identified in the previous Sprint Retrospective meeting.
The process of preventing exceptions from causing runtime errors is called exception handling.
This type of handling deals with exceptions in particular, which are all anomalies that will prevent the computer from doing its usual job. So those exceptions will be handled even before they get the chance to cause errors which will disturb the operations that the computer is carrying out.
It’s definitely is a huge problem. I would suggest just ignoring them and reporting them.
