Answer:
"Ordering" is the correct solution.
Explanation:
- Ordering expenses are incurred in purchasing a new shipment of manufactured goods. This would include expenditures for the attempting to place of a purchase agreement, cost savings for the evaluation including its batches expected to receive, ends up costing for documentary evidence, etc.
- The cost of ordering correlated negatively with either the cost of transport. This appears to mean because the much more purchases a business location including its providers, the significantly higher the ordering costs will indeed be.
Answer:
B. minus$2,000.
Explanation:
The computation of the economic profit is shown below:
As we know that
Economic profit = Total revenue - Explicit costs - Implicit costs
= $35,000 - $30,000 - $7,000
= -$2,000
The implicit cost is come from
= $70,000 ×10%
= $7,000
We simply applied the above formula so that the economic profit could come
Amount invested in both schemes is $45,000
returns in investment g is 75,000 in 6 years.
yearly return is:
75000/6=12,500
returns in investment h is 105,000 in 9 years
yearly return is:
105,000/9
=11,666.67
from the above results we can conclude that investment g has the higher returns.
Answer:
The company's net income for the month was $27 comma 000
Explanation:
Net income = Total Sales - total expense
During the month of May,
Total Sales = credit sales + cash sales = $35,000 + $25,000 = $60,000
The company paid wages of $ 24 comma 000, the wages expense was $ 24 comma 000.
The company paid utilities of $ 9 comma 000, the utilities expense was $ 9 comma 000
Total expense = wages expense + utilities expense = $24,000 + $9,000 = $33,000
The payment that the company received from its customer was not the sales or expense. It made increase cash and reduce account receivable.
Net income = $60,000 - $33,000 = $27,000
Answer:
c. Work in Process--Department 2 375,000 Work in Process--Department 1 375,000
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Work in Process - Department 2 $375,000 ($100,000 + $125,000 + $150,000)
To Work in Proces - Department 1 $375,000
(Being the flow of cost from Dept 1 to Dept 2 is recorded)
Here the work in process for dept 2 is debited as it increased the assets and credited the work in process for dept 2 as it decreased the assets
