Answer:
Through ASA axiom.
Step-by-step explanation:
It should be by ASA axiom.
The ASA Theorem says: If two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding parts of another triangle, the triangles are congruent.
The business owner should be told to angle a spotlight mounted on the roof at the angle of =39°
<h3>Calculation of angle</h3>
The distance of the flagpole from the building = 55ft
The building has the height of = 45ft
The flagpole has the height of = 25ft
The angle can be calculated using the formula;
Tan θ = opposite/adjacent
Where opposite= 45ft
adjacent = 55ft
Tan θ = 45/55 = 0.82
θ = Tan–¹0.82
θ = 39°
Learn more about angles here:
brainly.com/question/25716982
#SPJ1
Hello!
When multiply binomials together, we should use the FOIL method.
The FOIL method is an acronym for First, Outer, Inner, and Last.
First, let's set up the expression.
(7x - 1)(3x - 2)
Now, we can multiply in accordance with the FOIL method.
First: 7x · 3x = 21x²
Outer: 7x · -2 = -14x
Inner: -1 · 3x = -3x
Last: -1 · -2 = 2
Now, we simplify the inner terms.
21x² - 14x - 3x + 2
21x² - 17x + 2
Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 21x² - 17x + 2.
Answer:
For this case we want to check if the true mean for the depth of groves cut into aluminium by a machine is equal to 1.7 (null hypothesis) and the alternative hypothesis would be the complement different from 1.7. And the best system of hypothesis are:
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis ![\mu \neq 1.7[/tx]And the best system of hypothesis are:3. This two-sided test: H0: μ = 1.7 mm H1: μ ≠ 1.7 mmStep-by-step explanation:For this case we want to check if the true mean for the depth of groves cut into aluminium by a machine is equal to 1.7 (null hypothesis) and the alternative hypothesis would be the complement different from 1.7. And the best system of hypothesis are:Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu =1.7](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmu%20%5Cneq%201.7%5B%2Ftx%5D%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EAnd%20the%20best%20system%20of%20hypothesis%20are%3A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E3.%20This%20two-sided%20test%3A%0A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EH0%3A%20%CE%BC%20%3D%201.7%20mm%0A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EH1%3A%20%CE%BC%20%E2%89%A0%201.7%20mm%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EStep-by-step%20explanation%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EFor%20this%20case%20we%20want%20to%20check%20if%20the%20true%20mean%20for%20the%20depth%20of%20groves%20cut%20into%20aluminium%20by%20a%20machine%20is%20equal%20to%201.7%20%28null%20hypothesis%29%20and%20the%20alternative%20hypothesis%20would%20be%20the%20complement%20different%20from%201.7.%20And%20the%20best%20system%20of%20hypothesis%20are%3A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3ENull%20hypothesis%3A%20%5Btex%5D%5Cmu%20%3D1.7)
Alternative hypothesis [tex]\mu \neq 1.7[/tx]
And the best system of hypothesis are:
3. This two-sided test:
H0: μ = 1.7 mm
H1: μ ≠ 1.7 mm
Distance traveled in the first hour = 50 miles
Distance traveled in the second hour = 72 miles
Distance traveled in the third hour = 46 miles
Total distance = 50 + 72 + 46 = 168 miles
23 miles = 1 gallon
168 ÷ 23 = 7.30 gallons (nearest hundredth)
Answer: 7.30 gallons