Answer:
That statement is false
Explanation:
It's the other way around. Their research shows that when the canadians put in the same situation, their judgement regarding acts of violence actually similar and consistent with the judgement made by the americans.
(this research finding is a little bit surprising because Canadians are more well known to have a more polite and gentle culture)
In general , their judgement regarding acts of violence can be influenced by their primal human instincts.
For example, the research showed that:
- both canadians and Americans overwhelmingly approved that acts of violence are justifiable if being done toward people who are broken into their house.
- Both Canadians and Americans overwhelmingly disapproved of acts of violence toward group of protesters.
<u>Darwin would disagree with Tom. </u>Darwin recorded the major moments of his son’s development meticulously, often comparing them to those he had seen in apes. His notes were compiled in the book <em>The Descent of Man and The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals</em> (1872). Darwin discovered that children often develop in ways that resemble the behavior of apes, in particular orangutans. Darwin concluded that these emotions and character traits (ex. jealousy, need for attention, curiosity, fear, empathy, etc.) were innate, and were shared among different species.
On the other hand, John Locke, in his <em>Essay on Human Understanding</em>, famously referred to the human mind as a <em>tabula rasa</em> (“a blank slate”), with human beings being born with no prejudice or character traits, and every component of our personality and our mind being built solely on the basis of experience. <u>Therefore, Locke would think Tom is right in his opinion</u>.
These two views are at the extreme ends of the <em>nature vs. nurture</em> debate. Nowadays, scientists are inclined to believe that some traits are innate to humans, and some others are learned through experience, though the specific traits in each category are still a matter of debate.
Answer:
a. cultural pluralism
b. cultural evolution
c. cultural relativism
Cultural relativism is the idea that a person's beliefs, values, and practices should be understood based on that person's own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes this would be wise as the infant is not likely to have to pass a physical exam
Explanation:
It seems that both Andrew and Alice have a diseases that caused by GenetIcs. Even though genetic diseases do not always have 100% chance to be passed to the child, it's still a big enough reason for the paretns to take precations.
Most genetic diseases need time to show symptoms. Before the symptoms show, it is easier for the parents to make the baby pass insurance company's medical test. If they bring the child after he/she shows sysmtops, no company will want to accept the life insurance application.