1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivanshal [37]
3 years ago
15

Is better for children to be raised in an "intact" family where parents stay together despite high levels of conflict or by pare

nts who go their separate ways and presumably have less day to day conflict?
Social Studies
1 answer:
goldfiish [28.3K]3 years ago
4 0
It is better for a child to be raised by parents who go there separate ways and presumably have less day to day conflicts
You might be interested in
In his book, Savage Inequalities, former teacher Jonathan Kozol conducted an ethnography of public schools in major cities acros
Serggg [28]

Answer: by using local property taxes to fund public schools, trapping poor children in poor schools

Explanation: Jonathan Kozol is an American writer, educator, and activist best known for his publications on public education in the United States. In savage inequalities, Kozol pointed out how students from poor family background are trapped in poorly funded schools since public school funding comes from local property taxes which vary widely between communities.

The basis of Kozol's argument is the comparisons between rich and poor school districts, in particular the amount of money spent per child. School districts with relatively wealthy property-owners are spending over $20,000 per year per child while school districts where poor people live spend about $11,000 per year per child.

The pertinent question he asks is whether it is fair or right that the place of one's birth or residence should determine the quality of education a child is entitled to.

8 0
3 years ago
9. In the New England colonies, who would build ships? O men O women O children O slaves​
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

It says skilled labor, so that would include men that have the talent or skills to craft boats and ships. So I think the answer would be just men

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How does culture influence the self concept?
svlad2 [7]
It helps you maybe be more aware of your surroundings and what you are doing
3 0
3 years ago
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
Amber lives in a housing development between two parallel streets that both connect to a freeway. She usually takes the street t
aev [14]

Answer: C. a mental set

Explanation: The development of a rigid perception or inclination about the a methodology or approach simply because such approach has proved efficient at a certain point in time. The persistence in the use and application of this past idea or approach even when it is no longer the most efficient could be said to be caused by a mental set. In the context above, the street to the north provided a route for Amber after the street to the south was closed. Having used the route for three months during the closure period of the shorter street to the south, Amber developed a mental set causing him to be inclined or attached to taking the street to the north even after the shorter southern street was reopened.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Visitors to the zen garden of contemplation in japan are expected to ____.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following brought the U.S. economy out of the Great Depression?
    13·2 answers
  • All adult men who were member of the church were given the right to vote. true or false.
    9·1 answer
  • What do you see as the major strengths and flaws in the feedback control system used in the schools in this scenario
    8·1 answer
  • What are the anti corruption strategies
    13·1 answer
  • Kelsi's best friend tells her she does not want to be her friend anymore because she likes jessica better. although kelsi is sad
    7·1 answer
  • What is an example of a physical process?
    12·1 answer
  • The shaded Area is known as?
    5·1 answer
  • The Nepalese society is called the multilingual society. why ​
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!