Answer: Sergio's expression is incorrect because he can not simplify 3-6x and Leon's expression is incorrect because he did not multiply 3 by -1.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, given expression, 9 - (3 - 6x)
After simplifying this we get the following steps,
Step 1) 9 - (3 - 6x) = 9 - 3 +6x ( by removing parenthesis ) -----(1)
Step 2) 9 - (3 - 6x) = 6 + 6x
Step 3) 9 - (3 - 6x) = 6(1 + x) ( because 6 is common in both term of right side)
Since, when Sergio simplified it he wrote 9−(-3x), which is not matching to the above steps. that, is he is incorrect, because in his explanation he wrote -3x after simplifying 3-6x which can not be solved.
Moreover, the expression of Leon is also not matching to any of the above steps,
Thus he is also incorrect because after removing parenthesis he did not multiply 3 by -1 .
It's 248 ft because it increased by 24%, you do 200 ft times 1.24 to get 248 ft.
Answer: m∠7=130°
Step-by-step explanation:
If two parallel lines are cut by another line (transversal), each one will have four angles surrounding the intersection.
By definition, the adjacent angles of each parallel line, are supplementary, this means that they add up 180°.
Then, if m∠2=50°, then m∠3 is:
m∠3°
By definition, the angles that are in the same relative position are know as corresponding angles and they are congruent.
Therefore:
m∠3=m∠7
m∠7=130°
Answer:
the height of a pebble stuck in the tread of a tire
Step-by-step explanation:
hope it helps. make the brainliest