<span>Certainly not. The United States has never, since its founding, consisted of a small number of citizens, still less of citizens that could practically assemble in one place at one time and debate their actions. A pure democracy in this classical Greek city-state sense was never practical, and was not seriously considered.
What the Framers created was a constitutional representative republic. Sovereignty is vested in the people, like a democracy (and unlike a constitutional monarchy), but the people do not rule directly. Instead, they elect representatives, at regular intervals, and these rule in the peoples' stead. Their powers are limited, first, by the fact that they are elected for only short terms, and must be re-elected if they wish to continue in power, and secondly, and much more importantly, by the Constitution itself, which puts express written limits on their powers even between elections.</span>
The awnser is becasue the nations were united
The province of Quebec was the one that had a strong separatist movement in recent years,
and Quebec is the place where predominantly French-speaking population and
known as the second most populous province of Canada. So, the answer would be C,
the French-speaking portion.
Both sides get something out of it. If people are trading it is likely they are trading for something they don't have direct access to and therefore need to trade something for it so someone else can give it to them. If the trade is fair, both sides are happy and satisfied with the item(s) they received.
Answer:
Secession (derived from the Latin term secessio) is the withdrawal of a group from a larger entity, especially a political entity, but also from any organization, union or military alliance. Threats of secession can be a strategy for achieving more limited goals.
Explanation:
