Answer:
1. 40%
2. The theoretical probability is 3% greater than the experimental probability.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are informed that a number cube is rolled 20 times and the number 4 is rolled 8 times. The experimental probability of rolling a 4 is;
(the number of times a 4 was rolled)/(total number of rolls)
8/20 = 0.4
0.4*100 = 40%
The experimental probability of obtaining at least one tails, one or more tails, is represented in mathematical notation as;
P(HT or TH or TT)
The above events are mutually exclusive, thus;
P(HT or TH or TT) = P(HT) + P(TH) + P( TT)
= (22+34+16)/(28+22+34+16)
= 0.72 = 72%
On the other hand, the theoretical probability of obtaining at least one tails,
P(HT or TH or TT) = 3/4
= 75%
This is because there is at least one tail in 3 out of 4 possible outcomes.
Therefore, it is true to say that the theoretical probability is 3% greater than the experimental probability.
So hmmm let's see
she has a monthly income of 120 from investments, now, there are 12 months in a year, so her yearly income from investments are 120*12 or
$1440
she plays on a band, and makes 200 a week, now, there are 52 weeks in a year, so her yearly income from band playing is 200 * 52, or
$10400
her total annual income is 49696, now, if we subtract the band and investment income, we'd be left over with only what comes from her job payrate
so 49696 - 1440 - 10400 is 37856
so, she makes from her job, $37856 annually
now, she only works 28 hours weekly, how much is that yearly? well, 52 weeks in a year, she works 28*52 hours a year, let us divide 37856 by that
37856 ÷ ( 28 * 52) well, it ends up as 26
so, her hourly payrate is $26 per hour
now, she wants to ask for a raise, to make 51880 annually
well, if we check the difference of 51880 and 49696, that'd leave us with the difference in pay, or the raise annual amount
51880 - 49696 = 2184
ok, so she wants $2184 annually more from her work
how much is that in the hours she works annually? well 2184 ÷ ( 28 * 52)
Answer:
x is 54
Step-by-step explanation:
90-36=54
The answer is 7.14%
Your ruler measuring centimeters has lines for each centimeter. The rule for error is anything between 6.5 and 7.5 is considered 7cm. So the degree of error is plus or minus .5cm.
Your aim is 7cm so you divide your error of .5 by your target measurement. .5/7= 7.14 percent.
Step-by-step explanation:
that is only possible, if we don't need to use a 2 and a 5 (but especially the 2) to create the 1 in the middle (log(10) = log(2×5) or log (5×2) = 1).
in other words, if the 1 in the middle is just a given, and does not use any of our digits for is creation, then a solution is possible.
first of all, the upper left corner has to be log(0⁰). we cannot use the digit 0 for anything else. and 0^n (except for n = 0) is not a valid argument for a logarithm.
log(0⁰) = 0 log(2×1) = 0.3... log(9/4) = 0.35...
log(1×2) = 0.3... 1 log(3×6) = 1.26...
log(7/3) = 0.37... log(4×5) = 1.3... log(6⁹) = 7.0...
but as soon as we need to build the center 1 by log(10), which takes then away one of the 2s (as the only way to build 10 by multiplication is 2×5 or 5×2), there is no possible solution.
