<span>Because election results are often seen as indicators of public opinion, a victorious candidate may claim to have a MANDATE from voters
In democratic countries, election is being done in order to chose a leader to REPRESENT the majority of people.
With this logic, many winning candidates assume that the more votes you get, the more people choose you as a representative, which is very similar to them giving you a mandate</span>
1. The Union army fought very poorly for the first year of the war, experiencing defeats at the First Battle of Bull Run and every other major battle up to the Second Battle of Bull Run. Despite the string of defeats, the Union Army was not beaten but was dispirited. Morale was very low. Most of the army withdrew to positions north of the Potomac River to regroup. Confederate President Jefferson Davis wanted to end the war, which he believed he could do in one of several ways: Defeat the main force of the Union army, take Washington, DC, topple the Lincoln government, or gain recognition from major European powers. Davis ordered General Lee to cross the Potomac and put pressure on Washington. As the Confederate Army drew near to the capital, the Union army was quickly organized to engage and the two armies met near Sharpsburg, Maryland, along Antietam Creek.
2.At the US Civil War Battle of Antietam, is was the tactics not the strategies that were employed. Confederate General Robert E. Lee chose his best tactic based on the fact his army was vastly outnumbered. His tactic was to maintain a defensive posture causing Union General McClellan no choice but to use offensive if he wanted to send Lee and his army back to Virginia. So, classical defensive and offensive battle tactics were used.
3. The southern army was blocked.
Most history books claim that a lot of the africans were excited because they for obvious reasons liked the fact that the bible said God would see them as equals, because he does
<span>I had a question like this various Economics classes, as part of producer theory, trade, and overall economic growth. So I hope this translates to History as well.
The answer is C) Specialization leads to interdependence.
Why? If a country (or region, or industry) specializes in producing one thing, they will need to trade in order to get the other things they need.
A and D both go against this logic and are wrong. Specialization means picking something you are good at (producing at a lower price than others), and using all your resources for it.
B is probably wrong because it just seems silly. Not everyone will get rich. That's also part of Economics - there are ups and downs in the economy, there will always be some unemployment, etc.</span>
