Answer:
The irony is in the fact that both the lion and the tiger end up doing exactly the opposite of what they intended.
Explanation:
Hi. From the context of your question, we can see that you are referring to “The Cowardly Lion and Hungry Tiger,” which was written by L. Frank Baum. In this story we meet a lion who leaves its habitat determined to tear apart the first person it meets. In the same story, we see a tiger, which leaves its habitat determined to eat the first human baby it targets in front of it. The ironic thing is that when they find what they want they do completely different things.
The lion finds a woman lying on the ground and instead of tearing her to pieces, it lifts the woman and takes her home very gently and safely. The tiger, upon finding a baby on the ground, does not devour the baby, but takes it very gently to its mother, who is the woman the lion helped.
Answer:
Security seems to indicate a state or a feeling of absence of danger now and in the future, for oneself and one's own property and for one they have responsibility for, or have compassion for. In other words, it is being aware that a certain action will not cause future harm. The assumption of knowledge is fundamental from an epistemological point of view, since a system can evolve without giving rise to unwanted states, but it cannot be considered safe for this. Only scientific knowledge, therefore based on repeatable observations, can guarantee a sensible security assessment.
Total security is obtained in the absence of dangers. In an absolute sense, this is a concept that is difficult to translate into real life even if the application of security regulations makes the occurrence of harmful events and accidents more difficult and always translates into a better quality of life.
Sure, if she actually did die because of poisoning.
