Answer:
<em>Option "A" might be the correct answer</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>there are some of those viruses where it can be quite potent. Some viruses, such as the rhinoviruses, seldom cause serious illness. But others, such as parainfluenza and respiratory syncytial virus, can lead to severe lung infections in young children.</em>
Answer:
as the ratio comes to be 3:1
there for answer will be 3 red 1 white
Explanation:
hope it helped u buddy
Explanation:
Naturalists began to focus on the variability of species; the emergence of paleontology with the concept of extinction further undermined static views of nature. In the early 19th century Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744–1829) proposed his theory of the transmutation of species, the first fully formed theory of evolution.
In classical Latin, though, evolution had first denoted the unrolling of a scroll, and by the early 17th century, the English word evolution was often applied to 'the process of unrolling, opening out, or revealing'. It is this aspect of its application which may have been behind Darwin's reluctance to use the term.
hope it helps you
Answer:
Water has properties of cohesion and adhesion.
Explanation:
The single Hydrogen atom and double Oxygen atoms attach to each other in such a way their are minute polar polarity differences. Electron bonds will combine to form one side of the compound as being positive and the other side positive. Positive side of other H2O molecules will attach to the negative side. This bond causes water to adhere to sides of a glass test tube.
Will also create a bead when it drips on another non-porous surface. Adding soap will break the bead (surfactant). Water is the perfect solvent.
<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"
Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.
Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>
