Answer:
Risk: Too many workers wanting more money
Outcome: Less workers, anger, satisfaction in business growth
C: Yes, Damage on revenue side, too much work for happy workers, need to pay more money to workers
D: Give offer and more benefit to workers, pay them occasional breaks
Explanation:
Answer:
The change in interest rate will affect the consumption and saving in oppositte ways.
An increase in the interest rate makes spend money now more expensive while makes saving much better. So one goes up (savings) while another down(consumption)
The opposite is true is the rates decline. People will spend as it is cheap and savings decline.
While a tax, as it directly cuts a portion of income, it will make both decrease when up and increase when down. As less or more disposable income is available
Resuming savings and consumption has oppositve relaionship with interest rate
but same relationship with taxes
Explanation:
Answer:
modified no-fault plan.
Explanation:
Modified no-fault plan -
It refers to the situation , which allows the injured person to sue the other person , in case the amount of damage exceeds some verbal threshold or monetary threshold (according to the states rules ) , is referred to as modified no - fault plan .
In case of lesser loss than the verbal threshold , need to be given to the injured person .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is modified no - fault plan .
Answer:
$1,461
Explanation:
P(80-year-old female in the U.S. will die within 1 year) = 0.048711.
P(80-year-old female in the U.S. will survive one year) = 1 - 0.048711
P(80-year-old female in the U.S. will survive one year) = 0.951289
If 80-year-old female dies within one year, company will lose $(75000-x) but if she will survive, the company will make $x where x is the charge for its premium.
x(0.951289) - (30,000-x)0.048711 > 0
=> 0.951289x + 0.048711x - 30,000(0.048711) > 0
=> 1x - 1461.33> 0
=> x > 1461.33
=> x > 1461
x = $1,461
Answer: $8000
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Jerry and Julie are brother and sister and that Jerry sold stock to Julie for $5,000, its fair market value.
We are further told that the stock cost Jerry $10,000 five years ago and that Jerry also sold Carol (an unrelated party) stock for $2,000 that cost $10,000 three years ago.
Jerry's recognized loss before the $3,000 capital loss will be difference between $10,000 which was the cost and the 2000 which Jerry later sold it for. This gives:
= $10,000 - $2000
= $8000