I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
unlimited personal liability
Explanation:
This means that creditors of the business and individuals who have other claims against the owner can reach BOTH the owner's BUSINESS and PERSONAL ASSETS.
The correct answer is this - <span>this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting.
If the conditions were a little bit different, then his IRB review would also require different results. However, since there is no real interaction with the children, but rather only observation, an IRB review is not necessary in this case and can be avoided.
</span>
It should be noted that academic discipline of criminology uses scientific methods to study the nature, extent, cause, and control of criminal behavior.
With the help of Criminology the nature, extent, cause, and control of criminal behavior can be studied.
<h3>What is Criminology?</h3>
Criminology can be regarded as the study of all aspects of crime as well as law enforcement.
Learn more about Criminology at:
brainly.com/question/12809344
<span>Patrick Henry is the answer </span><span />
