Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
Answer:
The intent of the parties is to be bound by the contract.
<h3>What is the UCC battle of the forms rule?</h3>
- Typically these so-called battles of the forms occur when a buyer and seller of goods exchange pre-printed order forms with their own different terms on the back and then proceed with the transaction without ever signing any final contract or reaching an agreement on the terms of the deal.
To learn more about it, refer
to brainly.com/question/24553900
#SPJ4
Answer:
The government can influence interest rates, print money, and setting bank reserve requirements are all tools central banks use to control the money supply. Other tactics central banks use include open market operations and quantitative easing, which involve selling or buying up government bonds
Answer:
D. A limited liability company because he will only be liable for what he has invested in the business. His personal assets will be protected, and he can be taxed like a sole proprietorship.
