The revenue recognition principle guides accountants in Answer: D determine when to record revenues. The revenue recognition principle lets accountants know when they need to record revenues and at what amount to record. The revenue recognition principle states not to record revenue until it has been earned in full.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
Gross profit = Sales - Cost of goods sold
= (440 x 90 + 220 x 80 + 264 x 50) - (440 x 56.7 + 220 x 50.4 + 264 x 31.5)
= (39,600 + 17,600 + 13,200) - (24,948 + 11,088 + 8,316)
= 70,400 - 44,352
= $26,048
Ending inventory schedule attached in the excel archive
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
<u>Explanation:</u>
First, remember that the difference between <em>normative and positive economic analysis</em> is that;
Normative analysis take a somewhat neutral view by stating how the world should be. While
The Positive analysis states the facts. That is, it describes the world as it is.
<u>
Thus, a </u><u>Normative analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
c. In some cities such as San Francisco and New York, it would be impossible for low−skilled workers to live comfortably in the city without minimum wage laws.
d. The gains to winners of a minimum wage law should be valued more highly than the losses to losers because the latter primarily comprises businesses.
<u>And a </u><u>Positive analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
a. The minimum wage law causes unemployment.
b. A minimum wage law benefits some groups and hurts others.
It is a <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.
<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>
Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:
<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>
See the link below for more about Arbitration:
brainly.com/question/1139969
Answer:
sales tax
Explanation:
It does not choose discriminatory the more you spend the more you pay, from a moral perspective people would rather pay for what they get rather than what they make and then possibly invest or save. They would not want to pay taxes at least 3 times if it is an investment.
