1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elza [17]
3 years ago
13

A common misconception surrounding both environmental and social sustainability is that their practice increases supply chain co

sts disproportionately, and therefore should be enacted only when business leaders are willing to act altruistically or for the purposes of good public relation.
Business
1 answer:
alexandr1967 [171]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

In today's world it is a mistake to relate environmental and social sustainability to rising costs and altruism. It is a fact that consumers are more informed and have transformed their consumer relationship with companies, currently society demands organizational transparency and seeks to relate to entities that help in social and environmental development.

But more than altruism and improvement of the organizational image, companies that adopt an environmental and social management system achieve several strategic and economic benefits, which helps to reduce costs and waste, besides the possibility of market gain and increased customer satisfaction. stakelhoders, as the most important of the environmental and social management system, continuous process improvement, which in the long term becomes value for the organization.

You might be interested in
Sabrina, a production manager at Orrin Co., needs to measure the performance of 12 of her subordinates. She divides the number o
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer: Forced-distribution

Explanation:

The forced distribution is one of the type of method which is used by the various types of organizations or companies for the purpose of evaluating the performance of an employees by using the rating system parameter.

By using the forced distribution method the organizations are establishing the appraisal method by evaluating the productivity and the performance of an employees and it is also known as the management tool.

 According to the given question, Sabrina is the production manager at the Orrin Corporation and they needs to measure the overall performance of the subordinates so she is using the forced distribution method by dividing each employees into the different types of categories such as Exceptional, below average, Average and above average.      

 Therefore, Forced Distribution is the correct answer.  

8 0
2 years ago
Jeffreys Company reports depreciation expense of $40,000 for Year 2. Also, equipment costing $240,000 was sold for a $10,000 los
Daniel [21]

Answer:

Computation of cash received from the sale of the equipment:

D. $58,000.

Explanation:

Computation:

Sale of Equipment Account

Equipment account   $240,000

less acc. depreciation  172,000

Net book value           $68,000

less loss on sale            10,000

Cash received            $58,000

Equipment Account

Year 1 balance         $750,000

Year 2 balance           510,000

Sale of equipment  $240,000

Accumulated Depreciation:

Year 1 balance         $500,000

Year 2 balance          328,000

Sale of equipment   $172,000

b) The sale of the equipment caused a loss of $10,000.  The net book value of the equipment is $68,000.  This implies that it was sold for $58,000 ($68,000 - $10,000).  So, the cash received from the sale is $58,000.

7 0
3 years ago
Give examples if operational conflicts that could occur in a cross- cultural context because of different attitudes towards:1) t
DanielleElmas [232]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Give examples of operational conflicts that could occur in a cross-cultural context because of different attitudes towards:1) time, 2) individualism.

Well, let's start with time. In the United States, time is of the utmost importance. There we have the old saying: "Time is money."

In the workplace, everything is based on the smart and efficient use of time. No time must be wasted in the workplace.

Individual effort is important in the American culture, but the team effort, the concept of being a good team player is very important under the following premise: teams can accomplish more than individuals.

What most Americans desire is individual recognition through team effort.

That is why team sports are so good in the United States because they exemplify the way teams function and what they can accomplish. For instance, college and pro football, basketball, and baseball.

The region that has a different approach, is Latin America. This does not mean that is better than the other, just that there are major differences between the two.

The management of time is very different in Latin American countries. It is not as important as the US. People in Latin America approach the concept of time in a more relaxed way. In Latin America, there is a more relaxed approach to time. Nothing is urgent, Things take time. Things are made at a different pace compared to the US.

And regarding individualism, Latin American people tend to prefer to be more individualistic to do things trying to get some recognition, The team concept is not as developed as in the US.

5 0
3 years ago
A lifeguard in Florida was fired for leaving his assigned zone because he opted to help a drowning man, even though his supervis
hichkok12 [17]

Answer: <em>Post-conventional level of moral development</em>

Explanation:

Under this level an individuals sense of morality or moral sense is referred to as or defined in words of abstract values and principles. Individuals now tend to believe that few rule and laws are completely unjust and therefore should be eliminated or changed. This level is further marked by a thorough and growing realization i.e. an individuals is a separate entity from the society and thus that individual may tend to disobey the rules which might be inconsistent with his/her own principles.

5 0
3 years ago
The difference between the maximum price a consumer is willing to pay for a product and the actual price the consumer pays is ca
sineoko [7]

Answer:

The answer is consumer's surplus

Explanation:

Consumer's surplus is the difference between what the consumer or buyer is willing to pay and the amount he or she eventually paid.

For example, Mr A is willing to pay $100 for a product and the producer is willing to sell for $90. After much negotiation between mr A and the seller, he eventually paid $85. What he paid was lower than what he was willing to pay before.

So the consumer surplus is $100 - $85 = $15

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pablo is saving for a big-screen television. Which of the following actions could be the most harmful to Pablo's savings goal? S
    13·1 answer
  • The defect rate for your product has historically been about 2.00​%.
    6·1 answer
  • Relevancy ranking suggests internet search result will be placed in order of
    9·1 answer
  • Weiss Manufacturing intends to increase capacity by overcoming a bottleneck operation by adding new equipment. Two vendors have
    13·1 answer
  • What would happen if your boss at the bookstore asked you to decrease some of the business' variable costs
    14·1 answer
  • Looking at the relationship between elasticity and total revenue, we can say that
    7·1 answer
  • Suppose that it is friday night, that xavier and her friends have been out at a party, and that they are now heading home. suppo
    8·1 answer
  • The summer season is approaching, and
    14·2 answers
  • is it right to kick someone out just because they are not on the lease and or had been evicted in the past? my step-mom recently
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following types of credits would best describes home equity loans? a. closed and secured b. closed and unsecured c.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!