Answer:
Correct option is C
<u>Overall operating income will decrease by $25,000.</u>
Explanation:
Sales ratio = Sales of product 1 : Sales of product 2 = 200,000:300,000 = 2:3
Sum of sales ratio = 2+3 = 5
Common fixed cost:
Product 1 = 2/5×46,000 = $18,400
Product 2 = 3/5×46,000 = $27,600
Total net operating income = Net operating income of product 1 + Net operating income of product 2 = 46,600+(2,600) = 46,600-2,600 = $44,000
Now, comparing with the total net operating income of both the product ($44,000) with only product 1 ($19,000); overall operating income decreases by $25,000 (44,000-19,000)
This assertion is true. In addition, the SEC has the remaining accountability to make certain that the FASB deals with troubles referred to it by the SEC.
The cooperative effort between the public and personal sectors has given the United States the first-rate economic reporting gadget in the world, and the Commission is intent on making it even better.
<h3 /><h3>Who does the SEC document to?</h3>
19 The SEC is guilty to Congress as it operates beneath the authority of federal legal guidelines inclusive of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act), amongst others.
Learn more about SEC here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/3798508</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Answer:
The answer is 2.25
Explanation:
Price Elasticity of Supply (PES)= percentage change in Quantity demanded/ percentage change in price
PES= (30-20)/20 *100) /( 55-45)/45*100) = 50%/22.22% = 2.25
Answer: 0.1282
Explanation:
Total number of possible outcome( total candidates) = 13
Total number of men = 13 - 8 = 5
Total number of women = 8
Number of candidates to be selected = 2
Find the probability that both are men :
Probability of 1st candidate being a male = required outcome ÷ total possible outcome = 5/13
Probability of second candidate being a male, means we now have 4 men left and a total of 12 = 4/12
Therefore, P = (5/13) × (4/12)
P = (5/13) ×(1/3) = 5/39 = 0.1282
Answer:
Follows are the responses to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
Yeah, throughout the state court they will ever sue against fraud. As base with the that State is appropriate so because the main place of work is specific budget inventory representatives Inc.
In point b:
Thomas couldn't sue for cheating at the federal court successfully, because equality in nationality would be the only conceivable way. Because as a federal problem also isn't involved, Thomas and both are comprehensive residents of Michigan weren’t diverse for this situation. The business is a resident of all its corporate headquarters and the State of formation.
In point c:
Throughout this situation, silver can claim nationality plurality, as Oklahoma's comprehensive would not be a citizen. It simple company does company in such a state doesn't render that business a citizen. However, if silver has been damaged in terms of $75,000, this failure combined with citizenship diversity would allow it to sue extensively in a federal court. This event does not tell everyone how slowly he lost, however, the facts weren't enough to make a correct judgment.
