The answer is A. Multitasking. For three reasons: <span>You’re less productive. It is scientifically proven that there is no such thing as multitasking. You're simply switching from one task to another. When your brain tries to switch it needs to rethink about what its doing which wastes time.
You sabotage your ability to do good work. Constantly switching from one thing to another means you can't focus on one specific thing. This often leads to mistakes which means you need to take extra time to fix it anyway.
You squelch your creative juices. In other words when you go back and forth from one thing to another you're preventing your thoughts from developing into other thoughts. Which could potentially prevent a brilliant idea.Stay safe. Focus!
</span>
Answer:
$189,000
Explanation:
The computation of total expense with regards to this payroll is shown below:-
Total expense = Salaries and wages earned by employees + Employer's portion of FICA taxes
= $180,000 + $9,000
= $189,000
Therefore for computing the total expenses with regards to this payroll we simply applied the above formula and we ignore all other values as they are not relevant.
Answer:
$978,306
Explanation:
The computation of the unremembered liability coupons is shown below:
= (Number of coupons issued × redeemed coupon percentage) - (processed coupons) × worth of coupon
= (841,000 coupons × 73%) - (381,000 coupons) × $4.20
= (613,930 coupons - 381,000 coupons) × $4.20
= 232,930 coupons × $4.20
= $978,306
We simply deduct the processed coupons from the redeemed coupons and then multiply it by the coupon worth
<span>Too find he lowest units price you divide the price per pound by the number of pounds. At the first store it is roughly 44 cents per unit. The second store is about 33 cents per unit. The lower unit price is 33 cents per pound at the second store.</span>
<span>n/2 = average number of items to search.
Or more precisely (n+1)/2
I could just assert that the answer is n/2, but instead I'll prove it. Since each item has the same probability of being searched for, I'll simulate performing n searches on a list of n items and then calculate the average length of the searches. So I'll have 1 search with a length of 1, another search looks at 2, next search is 3, and so forth and so on until I have the nth search looking at n items. The total number of items looked at for those n searches will be:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ... + n
Now if you want to find the sum of numbers from 1 to n, the formula turns out to be n(n+1)/2
And of course, the average will be that sum divided by n. So we have (n(n+1)/2)/n = (n+1)/2 = n/2 + 1/2
Most people will ignore that constant figure of 1/2 and simply say that if you're doing a linear search of an unsorted list, on average, you'll have to look at half of the list.</span>
