Answer:
<em>some </em><em>slogans </em><em>could </em><em>include</em><em>:</em>
- <em>corruption</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>a </em><em>silent </em><em>killer</em>
- <em>corruption</em><em> </em><em>hurts </em><em>all </em><em>of </em><em>us</em>
- <em>champions </em><em>don't</em><em> </em><em>cheat</em>
- <em>time </em><em>to </em><em>unite </em><em>against</em><em> </em><em>corruption</em>
<em>I </em><em>hope</em><em> this</em><em> helps</em>
Answer:
Based on the graph, the amount of oil reserves held by the Middle East compares to the rest of the world because the Middle East holds the most oil reserves.
Explanation:
Answer:
You will see an afterimage of the star in C. green hue.
Explanation:
The Opponent-Process Theory explains that an individual's perception of colors operates under 3 opposing systems:
- Black vs. white
- Red vs. green
- Blue vs. yellow
An individual perceives a hue based on 2 colors but he/she <em>can only see </em><em>one </em>of these opposing colors at once.
In this case, if you stare at a red star, you are looking at the red vs. green system so once you are done looking at the red, you will see the <em>green afterimage</em> of it, since green opposes red.
The behavioral predictor of members of a social group according to Georg Simmel is the number of people in the group
<h3>Who is Georg Simmel?</h3>
Georg Simmel was an eminent German sociologist and structural theorist who studied urban life as well as the metropolis' structure.
He was notable for developing social theories that promoted a technique of studying society that differed from the then-accepted scientific approach used to investigate the natural environment.
In his studies, he states that the behavioral predictor of members of a social group is the<u> number </u><u>of </u><u>people</u> in the group.
Learn more about Georg Simmel here:
brainly.com/question/3065333
Option C
The peer review process, in which scientists submit write-ups of their ideas and experiments to a set of colleagues who judge how good the ideas are before the ideas can be published, is: A useful and important, even if imperfect, mechanism of quality-control for the scientific literature
<u>Explanation:</u>
The peer-review practice endures to approve scholarly work, accommodates to enhance the worth of proclaimed research, and builds networking circumstances in research areas. Notwithstanding critiques, peer review is yet the unique internationally affirmed system for research validation.
Peer review guarantees that documents undergo a fair evaluation and skillful opinion, enabling scholars to develop their script and therefore high-quality experimental interpretation and articles to be proclaimed. It also encourages the browsers to believe the scientific uprightness of the report and to present notified declarations where peer reviewer comments are ready.