It doesn't apply to executive orders
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,
However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."
We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.
The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.
<span>the Civil War. really hope this helps :)</span>
Answer:
this is what you get. its not nice just to take ppls points who need help
Explanation:
In The Social Contract (1762) Rousseau argues that laws are binding only when they are supported by the general will of the people. His famous idea, 'man is born free, but he is everywhere in chains' challenged the traditional order of society.
