1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lakkis [162]
3 years ago
6

Angelo is a mixed-martial artist. He is fighting Petra, the heavyweight champion. Angelo is terrified of Petra but looks happy a

nd laughs in Petra's face during the stare-down moments before the match. Angelo is using the display rule of:________.
Social Studies
2 answers:
meriva3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Masking

Explanation:

Masking occurs when an individual masks or cover up their true personality or identity  in order to conform to harassment, abuse or societal pressures. It an individual's way of hiding or repressing their emotion ( jealousy, fear or anger) in other to be accepted by others. They disguise certain emotions that could termed socially unacceptable.

Environmental factors like rejection, physical abuse, emotional abuse or sexual abuse can greatly impact or influence masking. Sometimes an individual masks without even knowing.

Angelo who was trying to cover up his terrified state by laughing was using the display rule of masking.

Ivahew [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Masking

Explanation: Display rules simply refers to the informal norms on how to express one's emotions appropriately and the most common way is by masking.

Masking is the act of hiding or suppressing one's through feelings or emotion while displaying the opposite i.e while one feels anger and hatred in their hearts, they conceal it and smile at you.

Angelo displayed expression (happy and smiling) was a direct opposite of what she felt inside of her, this is a good illustration of the display rule of Masking.

You might be interested in
How do natural resources affect communities history
vredina [299]

Answer:

Natural resources tend to heavily correlated with the history technological development and conflicts in the community.

Explanation:

Natural resources is necessary for a people to develop their infrastructures and generate wealth. The more wealth a community able to accumulate, the more likely that community will invest in the development of science /technology that might help them in the future.

But, it's also provide one downside. Existence of natural reserouces tend to attract the attention of other communities who wanted to take ownerships over that resources. As a result, it has the likelihood of causing conflict throughout the communities' history.

5 0
3 years ago
Unlike the Indus Valley civilization, the Mesopotamians made a great contribution to justice by establishing ______________.
alexandr402 [8]

Answer:

B) Hammurabi's code

Explanation:

I hope it helps u.

Mark me as brainlist answer.

thank you

3 0
3 years ago
Which describes the magnetic field lines near a long straight wire carrying current?
Lorico [155]

The magnetic field lines near a long straight wire carrying current is the magnetic field near a long straight wire is concentric circles.

The magnetic field is the place around a magnetic fabric or a moving electric-powered price within which the pressure of magnetism acts. A pictorial illustration of the magnetic discipline describes how a magnetic force is shipped inside and around a magnetic material.

A magnetic field is a vector area that describes the magnetic impact on shifting electric fees, electric-powered currents, and magnetic substances. A moving charge in a magnetic subject experiences a pressure perpendicular to its very own pace and to the magnetic field.

Examples of magnetic fields are a compass, a motor, the magnets that keep stuff on the fridge, train tracks, and new curler coasters. All moving prices supply upward push to a magnetic area and the fees that flow thru its areas, experience a force.

Learn more about the magnetic field here brainly.com/question/7802337

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Family and Economic Trends in Canada
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

Fifty years of families in Canada: 1961 to 2011

During the 50-year period from 1961 to 2011 which corresponded with the censuses of population, considerable social and economic changes occurred in Canada that influenced evolving family dynamics.

The concepts and measurements used in the census have changed over time to reflect this diversity (see Box 1).

Box 1: Timeline of conceptual changes by census year

1981: First year data are available for common-law unions.

2001: Same-sex common-law couples are first counted.

Also in 2001, the census family concept  include:

children in census family who were previously married

skip-generation families (grandparents and grandchildren in the same dwelling and without the presence of a middle-generation parent)

a child and his/her lone parent (middle generation) living in a three-generation household. Prior to 2001, the two older generations would have formed a census family.

2006: Same-sex married couples are first counted, following the legalization of same-sex marriage across Canada in 2005.

2011: Couples with children can be classified as intact families or stepfamilies.

 

Data on common-law couples were available for the first time from the 1981 Census of Population, and they represented 5.6% of all census families that year. Since then, the proportion of common-law couples has grown steadily to 16.7% of all census families in 2011. In fact, for the first time in 2011, the number of common-law couple families in the country surpassed the number of lone-parent families (1,567,910 compared to 1,527,840).

The share of lone-parent families has increased

In 2011, lone-parent families represented 16.3% of all census families. This was almost double the share of 8.4% in 1961 when relatively more childbearing took place within marriage and divorce rates were lower .  

While today's census families are characterized by diversity, this was also the case for families in the first half of the 20th Century, but often for different reasons.

Widowhood and remarriage following the death of a spouse were more common in the early decades of the 1900s, when there was higher maternal mortality and higher mortality rates overall for infants, children and adults. There were also many deaths which occurred during the two world wars and the Korean War. In 1921, for example, nearly 1 in 10 children aged 14 and under (8.8%) had experienced the death of at least one parent. As a result, lone-parent families were relatively prevalent in the early decades of the 20th Century. These families represented 12.2% of all census families in 1941; a level that was higher than in 1961 (8.4%), near the height of the baby boom, and that was not surpassed again until 1986.

The ratio of female lone-parent families to male lone-parent families has been fairly constant over the past 50 years at about 4 to 1. While the sex distribution of lone-parent families changed little between 1961 and 2011, the legal marital status of lone parents evolved considerably during this time .

In 1961, the majority of lone parents (61.5%) were widowed; a small proportion (2.7%) reported never having been married and the remaining 35.8% were divorced or separated. accompanied by an increase in the prevalence of never-married or divorced lone parents. By 2011, the most common legal marital status for lone parents was divorced or separated (50.8%), followed by a more than ten-fold increase for those who were never married (31.5%), while 17.7% of all lone parents were widowed.

Families and households have become smaller

Canadian families have become smaller over time. This occurred partly because of a decline in the total fertility rate after the baby boom and the fact that lone-parent families increased in recent decades. The average number of children per family decreased from 2.7 in 1961 to 1.9 in 2011.

While family size declined over the period, the number of households increased. In each 5-year period between 1961 and 2011, the number of private households grew faster than the population, particularly between 1966 and 1981 .

Households have also become smaller in recent decades. This has been due largely to increased shares of one- and two-person households and to decreases in the proportion of large households comprised of five or more people.

In 2011, households consisting of one person accounted for 27.6% of all households; about a three-fold increase from 9.3% in 1961. During the same period, the share of large households comprised of five people or more decreased from 32.3% in 1961 to 8.4% in 2011.

4 0
3 years ago
How much does ability determine success?
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

A lot

Explanation:

If you have the ability of perseverance and hard work, you are destined for success. If you have no ability and can only sit around and be lazy, you have no hope.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How to get away with copyright music on youtube?
    11·2 answers
  • For a piece of legislation to proceed to the Senate, it needs a certain number of votes. Whose job is it to organize the votes o
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following jobs are expected to grow significantly
    7·1 answer
  • How do the actions of the executive branch affect civilians?
    11·1 answer
  • Karl Marx is not the founder of conflict theory. (Points : 2) True False
    8·1 answer
  • What reason justifies saying AL = BE?<br> reflexive<br> transitive<br> CPCTE
    7·2 answers
  • Who actually put a curse on harry at the first Quidditch match
    9·2 answers
  • what term grants an author or composer the right to control the reproduction, musical, or other literary work
    13·2 answers
  • 3.) What is Gordon Brown saying in the first ten minutes of his speech and how much of it do you remember?
    10·1 answer
  • Approximately 71% of Earth's surface is covered with water. The majority of this water is salt water found in the oceans. Where
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!