Answer:
a study by researchers published on a university website
a book written by a scholar on the topic
Explanation:
These two resources come from credible professionals.
Answer:
ready I think it will be correct
The advice of the author of "Gadgets: Built To Not Last" is that consumers should prioritize buying more efficient and durable gadgets. The author of "Don't Fix Your Fridge, Just Buy a New One," advises consumers to buy more efficient products, with less energy consumption and less environmental impact.
<h3>What do the two articles have in common?</h3>
- The two articles show the role of the consumer in the market.
- The two articles show how consumers determine the production of electronics and appliances.
- The two articles show how consumers should evaluate the most economical and environmentally friendly options.
"Gadgets: Built To Not Last" states that current electronic devices are not very durable and this is encouraged by the industries so that they have a greater profit from sales.
The author of “Don’t Fix Your Fridge, Just Buy a New One,” says consumers should switch from their old appliances to more efficient ones that use less energy and pollute the environment less. However, he points out that this does not apply to all devices and therefore, the consumer must act with common sense.
More information on the environmental impact at the link:
brainly.com/question/9401633
I am not exactly sure what your teacher is looking for but I will do my best.
Let me know if there is anything else I can help with!
Slave ships were very unhighgenic. The people on them were not given enough supplies and were given very little food if any at all. They mostly had to stay in there very small plank beds. The rooms were very cramped. Because of the bad conditions, there were very high mortality rates.
Thanks for posting. I hadn't thought of it before.
The quick answer to this is that they gather leaves to make boats. As a science major, I'm a little doubtful this would work. Those ants covered acres and acres and their size though relatively small, were huge compared to other ants. The surface tension of water with a leaf might be enough to accommodate 20 ants, but that was a spit in the bucket.
Further, this implies that the ants were discriminating enough to stop eating the vegetation (which is the central conflict of the story) and decide that they had to forestall their appetite so they had leaves to cross. Even if they were capable of such higher lever mental abilities, there likely were not enough leaves around to accomplish the crossing.
All of that just so I could answer A
