Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What is congruency?</h3>
The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.
An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.
See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.
Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.
The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".
Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
Learn more about congruency at
brainly.com/question/14418374
#SPJ1
Answer:
70
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the final part 4x/40 = 7. We can simplify this to x/10 = 7 by dividing the numerator and the denominator by 4. We then multiply both sides by 10 to get x = 70
Step-by-step explanation:
if you're looking for x
x=180-42-51= 87°
and if you're looking for D
D= 180-42= 138°
Answer:
4(x+1)/(4x+5)
4(x+1)/(5-4x)
4(x-(-1))/(4x+5)
Step-by-step explanation:
The numerators in the fractions must equal to 0, or else the expressions won’t have the result of 0.
4(x+1)
4(-1+1)
4(0)
= 0
4(x-(-1))
4(-1-(-1))
4(-1+1)
4(0)
= 0
The expressions with the numerator as 0 have the result of 0.
Answer:
a
Step-by-step explanation:
