Answer:
Should Marston Manufacturing Company accept or reject the project?
Marston C Company should reject the project because its expected return is lower than Division H's cost of capital.
Since the divisions' risk is so different, and probably their projects are also very different, the company should use different costs of capital to accept of reject the projects based on each division's cost of capital.
Imagine another situation where Division L is evaluating a project that yields 10%. If they used the company's WACC, then they should reject the project, but if they used the division's cost of capital, then they should accept the project (in this case I would recommend accepting it).
Explanation:
Division H's risk = 14%
Division L's risk = 8%
WACC = 11%
Answer:
the present value is $467,335.2613
Explanation:
The computation of the value worth today is shown below:
= Amount in two years ÷ (1 + rate of interest)^number of years
= $590,000 ÷ (1 + 12% ÷ 2)^2×2
= $590,000 ÷ 1.06^4
= $590,000 ÷ 1.26247696
= $467,335.2613
Hence, the present value is $467,335.2613
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
Answer:
The question is missing information, however the way to approach the required is presented below in the explanation
Explanation:
When calculating variances it's always important to flex the budgeted information to standard form so we're comparing apples with apples. If we use the actual budgeted figures we can distort the variances and comparisons of information may be useless. For instance if we produce 40 units but budgeted was 50 units we need to work out what was the budgeted cost for 40 units and compare that to the actual cost of 40 units. That is what is meant by flexing to the standard form.
A) The fixed overhead spending variance is the difference between the budgeted and actual fixed overhead expense. This is calculated as follows
Actual fixed overhead - Budgeted fixed overhead = Fixed overhead spending variance $
B) The fixed overhead volume variance is calculated as follows;
Budgeted fixed overhead rate – Fixed overhead rate applied to the units (quantity of production)
C) Variable overhead spending variance is calculated as follows;
The variable overhead spending variance is the difference between the actual and budgeted rates of expenditure of the variable overhead.
Actual hours worked x (actual overhead rate - standard overhead rate)
= Variable overhead spending variance
D) Variable overhead efficiency variance is calculated as follows;
The variable overhead efficiency variance is the difference between the actual and budgeted hours worked. The standard variable rate per hour is used for this and must be calculated.
Standard overhead rate x (Actual hours - Standard hours)
Answer:
d. is correct
Explanation:
made it easier for teenagers to find jobs that offer the opportunity for training.
Everyone starts a career , step by step, from the minimum salary to the top of income.
