Answer:
I just did this and got the answer : true
Explanation:
I got it right for me hope i helped you
The correct answer is They thought it was necessary to protect the liberty of Americans.
The Federalists were a group of individuals who wanted a strong central government when developing the new US Constitution. The Federalists felt that the old constitution, the Articles of Confederation, was too weak and lacked the strength needed to keep the country together. This is why the Federalists advocated for a stronger federal (central) government.
The Federalists also wanted to ensure that the federal government did not become corrupt or tyrannical. This is why they approved of a system of checks and balances, in which each branch of the federal government has specific powers. For example, the legislative branch creates laws, the president enforces laws, and the judicial branch interprets the law.
Answer:
At first the Catholic Church reverted to the historic practices of banning and excommunication, followed by military repression. When these methods failed to stop the spread of Protestantism the Catholic Church turned to the Counter Reformation.As Protestantism swept across many parts of Europe, the Catholic Church reacted by making limited reforms, curbing earlier abuses, and combating the further spread of Protestantism. This movement is known as the Catholic Counter-Reformation.What were the three key elements of the Catholic Reformation, and why were they so important to the Catholic Church in the 17th century? The founding of the Jesuits, reform of the papacy, and the Council of Trent. They were important because they unified the church, help spread the gospel, and validated the church.
Explanation:
HOPE THAT HELPS!!!!
A "Formal Amendment" is one that actually adds to or changes the US Constitution. It is ratified by the states and becomes law.
<span>An "informal amendment"is a change to the meaning or interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. There is no real informal way to change the Constitution, and it's not an actual change to the wording of the Constitution; rather, it's the way we perceive the Constitution that changes. </span>
<span>The one that comes to mind is the equal rights amendment (1972) - which prohibits the inequality of men and women. Opponents say that the amendment is no longer needed, as the issues are already law</span>
