Hedricks implies that the other candidates do not understand the other regions and that they are not well known in other countries.
Further Explanation:
Since the candidate that Professor Hedrick was endorsing lived in both the North and West, he thought his candidate was better suited since he had traveled and knew others customs. His candidate was a true Southern and was known all over the states.
The other candidates were diverse themselves with some being from the South and also had diverse experiences and were also popular in the states. However, his candidate was more well known and understood the inner workings outside of his home state. The others did not have a following in other countries. He have his opinions based on his knowledge of the candidates and their travels. The professor was fired from his teaching position over his views on slavery.
Learn more about Professor Hedrick at brainly.com/question/12788133
#learnwithBrainly
Informal qualification for house membership indeed does vary from either a rural area to an urban area within the same state and in different states together with different times in history. This is a highly complex question which cannot be really answered in a fast manner. What is important is that one needs to consider the contextual variables which come into play when we're talking about house membership which drastically influence also all the other variables here.
Answer:
Some slaves risked everything to escape and join the British side during the American Revolution in order to <em>A) gain their freedom</em>. This was also a major motivation of slaves who sought to fight for the American side as well.
Explanation: