Sophia is more correct in her solution.
Your classmate's error about AB and DC being complimentary and parallel is that they misapplied the alternate angle property.
<h3>Why are AB and DC not parallel?</h3><h3 />
There isn't enough evidence presented in the diagram to say that AB and DC are parallel.
The evidence required would be proof that angle AWZ is equal to angle WZY.
Instead, all we have is that angle AWZ and angle XYC are equal which does not tell us what we need to know about AB and DC being parallel.
Find out more on properties of parallel lines at brainly.com/question/24607467
#SPJ1
The quotient refers to an answer that has been divided.
27658/6 = a quotient of 4 with a remainder of (2/3) (two-thirds)
Answer:
sorry
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't know what you want , do you want to know how to construct an inscribed angle or what
Note that
Answer:
Mary's risk premium is $0.9375
Step-by-step explanation:
Mary's utility function,
Mary's initial wealth = $100
The gamble has a 50% probability of raising her wealth to $115 and a 50% probability of lowering it to $77
Expected wealth of Mary, 
= (0.5 * $115) + (0.5 * $77)
= 57.5 + 38.5
= $96
The expected value of Mary's wealth is $96
Calculate the expected utility (EU) of Mary:-
![E_u = [0.5 * U(115)] + [0.5 * U(77)]\\E_u = [0.5 * 115^{0.5}] + [0.5 * 77^{0.5}]\\E_u = 5.36 + 4.39\\E_u = \$ 9.75](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E_u%20%3D%20%5B0.5%20%2A%20U%28115%29%5D%20%2B%20%5B0.5%20%2A%20U%2877%29%5D%5C%5CE_u%20%3D%20%5B0.5%20%2A%20115%5E%7B0.5%7D%5D%20%2B%20%5B0.5%20%2A%2077%5E%7B0.5%7D%5D%5C%5CE_u%20%3D%205.36%20%2B%204.39%5C%5CE_u%20%3D%20%5C%24%209.75)
The expected utility of Mary is $9.75
Mary will be willing to pay an amount P as risk premium to avoid taking the risk, where
U(EW - P) is equal to Mary's expected utility from the risky gamble.
U(EW - P) = EU
U(94 - P) = 9.63
Square root (94 - P) = 9.63
If Mary's risk premium is P, the expected utility will be given by the formula:

Mary's risk premium is $0.9375