The kettle falls five case illustrate a weakness of a
federal system in such a way that f<span>ederalism limits
political power and that it depends on compliance of state.</span>
<span>The federal system also aggravates the efficiency in awareness of Policies and its implementation.
The kettle falls five case was very surprising.</span>
Answer:
Turnover Company
The net income of Turnover will increase by $500,000.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Turner Company's shareholding in ICA = 10%
ICA pays dividend totalling $5 million
Turner's share of dividend = $500,000 ($5 million * 10%)
b) This is not based on equity accounting. Instead, the investment will be reported at fair value. Equity accounting method will be applied in recording Turner's investments in ICA Company, if the ownership interest is valued at 20–50% of the stock.
c) The $500,000 dividends received from ICA Company will be reported in the Income Statement of Turner Company as other income, unless Turner ordinarily buys and sells stocks. The 10% shareholding does not amount to significant control or influence for the accounts of Turner and ICA to be consolidated.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Note, the term diminishing marginal utility refers to an economic principle that states that the more unit of a particular commodity or service we consume, the more the satisfaction (utility) derived out of the consumption reduces or diminishes.
For instance, if I watched movies produced by a particular entertainment company for several days (eg Disney Studios), I may become dissatisfied using this particular entertainment provider and may decide to try another service (Netflix).
Another instance could occur after exercising, I'm given 3 bottles of coke, after taking my first bottle, the amount of utility I derive would reduce until I get to the third bottle, at this point I've reached my peak.
The law of diminishing marginal utility failed for someone I know who had used the same type of toothpaste and brushed her teeth at least once a day for a period of over 10 years.
Answer:
<em>1</em><em>. </em><em>Economies of scale.</em>
<em>2</em><em>. </em><em>Capital requirements</em><em>.</em>
<em>3</em><em>. </em><em>Product differentiation. </em>