Answer:
It's best to invest in the second economy
Explanation:
The question does not provide information on the hypothetical economic expectations of the two economies, but as a risk-averse investor, it's a better idea to try to "spread" the risk instead of concentrating it.
In the first economy, conditions might or might not be good. If they are good, returns will be extraordinary because all stocks will provide good returns, but if conditions take a turn for the worse, all stocks prices will fall and the financial consequences will be catastrophic.
In the second economy, results might never be as good as in the first economy, but they also will not ever be as bad. The risk is spread between various stocks, and while some may fall in price, others will rise, and viceversa. For a risk-adverse investor, this a far better option.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
(1) $15,054
(2) $12,990
Explanation:
The required table is not given in the question. Please find below the attachment of the table.
Given:
Future value,
= $30,000
If discounting rate is 9%, the present value will be:
= 
= 
= 
= 
($)
If discounting rate is 11%, the present value will be:
= 
= 
= 
= 
($)
Explanation:
The adjusted journal entry is shown below:
Corp Laundry supplies Expense A/c Dr $6,580
To Corp Laundry supplies A/c $6,580
(Being the corp supplies expense is recorded)
It is computed below:
= Purchased value of laundry supplies - still on hand
= $7,990 - $1,410
= $6,580
The answer is correct but The options that are given are incorrect.
Answer and explanation:
<em>Forgetting to pay debts has a detrimental effect on the length and interest payment of a loan</em>. The more a consumer falls behind in the repayment of a debt the longer it will take to pay off the total amount owed. Besides, the interest rate is recalculated by the financial institution implying more interest will be paid.
Therefore, forgetting to pay debts must be avoided. <em>Setting automated payments is a good measure to avoid such circumstances.</em>
Answer:
The Project should be rejected.
The Net present value is lower than zero. Meaning the returns on the investment yields a loss, as we are not able to cover our initial investments.
Explanation:
The Present value of the inflow and outflow should be considered before deciding the viability of the project.
Using the Net Present Value approach, we will want to consider against the outflows and at a certain cost of capital/rate of return if this projects meets at least the minimum threshold of breaking even. At this point the net cash flow would be at least zero for the project to be accepted.
Kindly review the document attached for detailed workings.
